2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2017.12.009
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of Clostridium botulinum group III's mobilome content

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Samples positive for all primers had also been reported in some other avian outbreaks [38]. It appears that type D is uncommon in avian botulism outbreaks and has not been reported in other available studies [16,21,22,38]. No type C BoNTs were detected either in the samples analyzed during our study or in previously published studies that distinguished type C/D from type C BoNTs [14,16].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Samples positive for all primers had also been reported in some other avian outbreaks [38]. It appears that type D is uncommon in avian botulism outbreaks and has not been reported in other available studies [16,21,22,38]. No type C BoNTs were detected either in the samples analyzed during our study or in previously published studies that distinguished type C/D from type C BoNTs [14,16].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Type D/C (7.84%), type D (3.27%), and samples positive for several or all primers (C, D, C/D, and D/C) (8.50%) were detected far more scarcely. Type D/C had been reported in studies conducted in Italy, where it had been found either in the intestinal contents of a stork [16] or from coot, duck, or heron samples [38]. All the type D/C-positive samples in our study were detected in turkeys and not in wild birds.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although these MGEs belong to different groups of mobile elements (p1_Cst and p1_BKT015925 are pseudolysogenic BoNT phages; Skarin et al, 2011 , p4_BKT015925 and p6_Cst have the characteristics of prophage-plasmid hybrids; Pfeifer et al, 2021 , CWou-2020a is a circular prophage and p2_BKT015925 is a plasmid; Skarin et al, 2011 ), they appeared to be genuinely recognized by the CRISPR systems. In a few cases, CRISPR protection was incomplete (e.g., against p4_BKT015925), because the strain had spacers as well as the immunized MGE as part of their genome ( Woudstra et al, 2017 ). This may suggest that these MGEs persist even in the presence of spacers matching with 100% homology, using an unidentified strategy (screening for anti-CRISPR using AcRanker was negative, data not shown; Eitzinger et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%