2009
DOI: 10.1080/00150190902852083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of Clean Ferroelectric Surface in Ultra High Vacuum (UHV): Surface Conduction and Scanning Probe Microscopy in UHV

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1(b), shows that the transition width of the 180 • domain is less than 100nm and the potential difference of the 180 • domain is 100 mV. As a result of our experiment, the transition width confirms the validity of the standard 180 • domain theory [5][6][7][8], but disagrees with the closure domain model [4].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1(b), shows that the transition width of the 180 • domain is less than 100nm and the potential difference of the 180 • domain is 100 mV. As a result of our experiment, the transition width confirms the validity of the standard 180 • domain theory [5][6][7][8], but disagrees with the closure domain model [4].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…As a result, our experimental result of the potential difference of 180 • domain cannot be explained only by extraneous origins like contamination, oxygen deficiency etc. We conclude that other intrinsic compensation, for example, by a surface carrier layer, should exist and the ferroelectrics is intrinsically stable [7,12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The origin of the particle surface conductivity has been attributed to ferroelectric structures or ionic surface charge migration in aqueous environments . As the ceramic powder bulk is electrically insulating and not metallic, the conductivity can be due to electronic conduction when spontaneous polarization is present, which is commonly observed for hydrothermal nanoparticles. Polarity of the protic solvent leaves the possibility that the conductivity is ionic in nature .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surface conductivity of ceramic nanoparticles per volume or mass is higher in comparison with the analogous microparticles. Ferroelectric metal oxides have been observed to have much greater surface conductivity than bulk conductivity compared with other ceramic nanoparticles depending on the size, composition, and type of material, for example, the titanium oxides . Although the specific origin of the surface conductivity is not understood, dielectric properties are influenced by surface conductivity and surface energy effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This instability is apparently resolved by inappropriate use of large permittivity as in Eq. (1), which would mean the necessity of intrinsic electrostatic screening due to free charges [13][14][15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%