2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of clay mineralogy in a temperate acidic soil of a forest using X-ray diffraction profile modeling: Beyond the HIS and HIV description

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
21
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
4
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Discrete chlorite and kaolinite can also be identified in the 2-0.2 µm subfraction from their rational series of 00l reflections. Low-angle asymmetry of the kaolinite reflection at 7.25 Å (see for example the 0.2-0.05 µm subfraction in Figure 2b) suggests the possible presence in the two finest subfractions of a kaolinite-illite (KI) as previously reported [23][24][25]. As in the bulk <2 µm fraction, the presence of a mixed layer dominated by expandable layers can be identified in the 2-0.2 µm subfraction from the shift in the peak position of the broad reflection from ~13.6 to ~16.7 Å following EG solvation.…”
Section: Qualitative Mineralogy Of Clay Subfractionssupporting
confidence: 71%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Discrete chlorite and kaolinite can also be identified in the 2-0.2 µm subfraction from their rational series of 00l reflections. Low-angle asymmetry of the kaolinite reflection at 7.25 Å (see for example the 0.2-0.05 µm subfraction in Figure 2b) suggests the possible presence in the two finest subfractions of a kaolinite-illite (KI) as previously reported [23][24][25]. As in the bulk <2 µm fraction, the presence of a mixed layer dominated by expandable layers can be identified in the 2-0.2 µm subfraction from the shift in the peak position of the broad reflection from ~13.6 to ~16.7 Å following EG solvation.…”
Section: Qualitative Mineralogy Of Clay Subfractionssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…For 2-0.2, 0.2-0.05 and <0.05 µm subfractions simulation was performed between 3.5 and 50 • 2θ using the Sybilla program developed by Chevron™ [45] from the mathematical formulation reported by Drits and Tchoubar [46]. This modelling is based on the direct comparison between experimental and calculated 00l XRD reflections, and fitting was done via trial-and-error determination of structure factors to arrive at a single structure model which fits the profiles obtained from both Ca-AD and Ca-EG treatments according to the multi-specimen technique [23,25,[35][36][37][38]. Such an approach relies on the differences in layer-to-layer distances and structure factors for expandable layers arising from the different treatments (AD/EG) and yields the proportion or weighted concentration of each independent phase in the sample.…”
Section: Simulation Of Xrd Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations