Investigation of Biological Feedback Influence on Posture and Knee Biomechanics During Running

Yalçın, Begüm; Bayram, Hande Argunsah; Bayram, Mehmed Bugrahan; Işık, Anıl

doi:10.1109/biyomut.2017.8479002

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The devices are connected with a bespoke wireless protocol that enables synchronised data capture [ 113 ]. This system has been used to analyse technique during walking [ 114 , 115 ], running [ 116 , 117 ], cycling [ 118 , 119 ], and more novel activities such as goalkeeper diving [ 120 ], cricket bowling [ 121 ], change of direction tasks [ 122 ], and jumping in handball [ 123 ]. A similar array of sensors, with the addition of EMG sensors designed to be stuck to the skin, has been developed by dorsaVi Ltd. (Victoria, Australia) [ 124 ].…”

Section: Commercialised Wearable Technologies For Sportsmentioning

confidence: 99%

E-Textiles for Sports and Fitness Sensing: Current State, Challenges, and Future Opportunities

Yang,

McErlain-Naylor,

Isaia

et al. 2024

Sensors

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

E-textiles have emerged as a fast-growing area in wearable technology for sports and fitness due to the soft and comfortable nature of textile materials and the capability for smart functionality to be integrated into familiar sports clothing. This review paper presents the roles of wearable technologies in sport and fitness in monitoring movement and biosignals used to assess performance, reduce injury risk, and motivate training/exercise. The drivers of research in e-textiles are discussed after reviewing existing non-textile and textile-based commercial wearable products. Different sensing components/materials (e.g., inertial measurement units, electrodes for biosignals, piezoresistive sensors), manufacturing processes, and their applications in sports and fitness published in the literature were reviewed and discussed. Finally, the paper presents the current challenges of e-textiles to achieve practical applications at scale and future perspectives in e-textiles research and development.

show abstract

Section: Commercialised Wearable Technologies For Sportsmentioning

confidence: 99%

E-Textiles for Sports and Fitness Sensing: Current State, Challenges, and Future Opportunities

Yang,

McErlain-Naylor,

Isaia

et al. 2024

Sensors

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Baseline stride frequency was measured at a self-selected cadence. Thresholds for biofeedback were defined as 90% [76] (38), 100% [76], 107.5% [62,72], 110% [74][75][76] or 120% [74,76] of the baseline cadence. In some studies, SF thresholds were combined with foot load area [75] and vertical body displacement [76].…”

Section: Stride Frequencies (Sf)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…They usually come with some electronic components that provide auditory, visual or somatosensory feedback to the users [ 35 , 36 ]. In some cases, these devices analyze and transmit information immediately, generating biofeedback in real time [ 37 , 38 ]. Some latest techniques were developed to track balance [ 39 , 40 ], joint load [ 41 ], symmetry in the movement and joint angles [ 42 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of Wearable Devices with Biofeedback on Biomechanical Performance of Running—A Systematic Review

Giraldo-Pedroza

Lee

Lam

et al. 2020

Sensors

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This present review includes a systematic search for peer-reviewed articles published between March 2009 and March 2020 that evaluated the effects of wearable devices with biofeedback on the biomechanics of running. The included articles did not focus on physiological and metabolic metrics. Articles with patients, animals, orthoses, exoskeletons and virtual reality were not included. Following the PRISMA guidelines, 417 articles were first identified, and nineteen were selected following the removal of duplicates and articles which did not meet the inclusion criteria. Most reviewed articles reported a significant reduction in positive peak acceleration, which was found to be related to tibial stress fractures in running. Some previous studies provided biofeedback aiming to increase stride frequencies. They produced some positive effects on running, as they reduced vertical load in knee and ankle joints and vertical displacement of the body and increased knee flexion. Some other parameters, including contact ground time and speed, were fed back by wearable devices for running. Such devices reduced running time and increased swing phase time. This article reviews challenges in this area and suggests future studies can evaluate the long-term effects in running biomechanics produced by wearable devices with biofeedback.

show abstract

Investigation of Biological Feedback Influence on Posture and Knee Biomechanics During Running

Cited by 2 publications

References 9 publications

E-Textiles for Sports and Fitness Sensing: Current State, Challenges, and Future Opportunities

E-Textiles for Sports and Fitness Sensing: Current State, Challenges, and Future Opportunities

Effects of Wearable Devices with Biofeedback on Biomechanical Performance of Running—A Systematic Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About