2015
DOI: 10.12693/aphyspola.128.a-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of Auditory Objects Caused by Directional Sound Sources in Rooms

Abstract: The auditory impression of sound sources is strongly influenced by the room, which, e.g., determines the apparent source width. What is more, typical sources are not omnidirectional, which also makes their orientation a strong influence. This influence, however, has only been investigated a little, although it can even change the perceived location of the source. To provide more insight, we performed extensive listening experiments inside our anechoic laboratory that is equipped with a 24-channel loudspeaker p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the loudspeaker was turned by 180, facing away from the listener, the plausibility was seriously affected, if the same approach was used (Neidhardt, 2021). This confirms the findings by Zotter & Frank (2015); Steffens et al (2021) and shows that auralizations created by the various signal processing approaches should be tested with such an indirect reproduction scenario because it is much more critical than the listening positions in front of a sound source.…”
Section: Required Accuracy Of Physical Propertiessupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If the loudspeaker was turned by 180, facing away from the listener, the plausibility was seriously affected, if the same approach was used (Neidhardt, 2021). This confirms the findings by Zotter & Frank (2015); Steffens et al (2021) and shows that auralizations created by the various signal processing approaches should be tested with such an indirect reproduction scenario because it is much more critical than the listening positions in front of a sound source.…”
Section: Required Accuracy Of Physical Propertiessupporting
confidence: 88%
“…It was shown that these natural reflection properties result in a considerably different appearance of the precedence effect (Robinson et al, 2013; Wendt & Höldrich, 2021) and for surfaces in close distances (< 50 cm) additional near-field effects occur (Paasonen et al, 2017). Adding first-order image source reflections to a rotating directional sound source in a small room can lead to considerable shifts of the apparent source direction (Zotter & Frank, 2015). The addition of further reflections did not cause additional localization shifts, only smoothed the transition.…”
Section: Required Accuracy Of Physical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a similar room simulation, the study in [21] asked participants to indicate the perceived direction of an auditory event created by a third-order directional source. The results showed that for different source orientations, listeners perceived auditory objects at directions that often did not coincide with the sound source, but with the delayed reflection paths, cf.…”
Section: Perceived Directionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laitinen [21] and Wendt [22] present experiments that use compact spherical beamformer arrays to vary distance impressions by crossfading between direct and indirect, rather diffuse sound reinforcement. In previous studies [23][24][25][26], we were able to show the basic characteristics of static and dynamic beamforming in various experiments using stationary and transient sounds. In a performance situation, a quarter-circle arrangement of reflectors is often employed to support a robust and detailed spatialization throughout the audience area [27], cf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%