2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0732-8893(02)00401-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of an anaerobic microbial community associated with a corneal ulcer by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and 16S rDNA sequence analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has also been suggested that corneal biopsies are more sensitive than the corneal sampling technique used in this study for the isolation of obligate anaerobic bacteria 38 . Additionally, some obligate anaerobic bacteria identified as pathogens of the human cornea have proven impossible to isolate with current microbiologic techniques and can only been identified with molecular diagnostics 31,39 . If similar bacteria were present within the animals of this study, the experimental methods would not have permitted their identification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…It has also been suggested that corneal biopsies are more sensitive than the corneal sampling technique used in this study for the isolation of obligate anaerobic bacteria 38 . Additionally, some obligate anaerobic bacteria identified as pathogens of the human cornea have proven impossible to isolate with current microbiologic techniques and can only been identified with molecular diagnostics 31,39 . If similar bacteria were present within the animals of this study, the experimental methods would not have permitted their identification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…PCR-DGGE has previously been used for analysis of the human microbiota of the gastrointestinal tract (10,16,20), vagina (4), oral cavity (12), and eye (13). However, this is the first report of the application of this technique to samples from the sinuses.…”
Section: Case Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the universal character, broad‐range real‐time PCR is more vulnerable to contamination of reagents than species‐specific real‐time PCR, which affects sensitivity. When only little amounts of the pathogen DNA compete with the contaminating DNA, the amplification of the pathogen can either be suppressed or mixed sequences are generated which cannot be sequenced without prior separation of the PCR products by cloning or DGGE‐analysis (Schabereiter‐Gurtner et al. 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%