2013
DOI: 10.1080/02786826.2013.763896
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of a New Electrostatic Sampler for Concentrating Biological and Non-Biological Aerosol Particles

Abstract: The detection of airborne pathogens is becoming a subject of great concern in modern day society. Recent studies have shown that electrostatic samplers are suitable for collecting microorganisms as well as preserving their viability. In most of these studies, flow rates were lower than 12.5 L/min or required a concentration stage to increase the flow rate to 100 L/min. In the present study, a single stage electrostatic sampler was developed for an efficient collection of microorganisms at 100 L/min. The design… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Microorganisms such as bacteria, fungal spores, and viruses carried by air movements are referred to as bioaerosols (Harper 1961; Killingley et al, 2013; Kumar et al, 2018). While most research on bioaerosol sampling has focused primarily on human and animal pathogens (Belser et al, 2013; 2016; Gustin et al, 2013; Kormunth et al, 2018; Mitchell et al, 2003; Roux et al, 2013; Suresh and Ricke 2002; Yamamoto et al, 2010). This study applied this emerging technology to the detection of insect-transmitted plant pathogens, specifically the whitefly-transmitted Begomoviruses that threaten many of the subsistence crops worldwide (Czosnek et al, 2017; Moffat 1999: Polston and Andersen 1997: Rosario, et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Microorganisms such as bacteria, fungal spores, and viruses carried by air movements are referred to as bioaerosols (Harper 1961; Killingley et al, 2013; Kumar et al, 2018). While most research on bioaerosol sampling has focused primarily on human and animal pathogens (Belser et al, 2013; 2016; Gustin et al, 2013; Kormunth et al, 2018; Mitchell et al, 2003; Roux et al, 2013; Suresh and Ricke 2002; Yamamoto et al, 2010). This study applied this emerging technology to the detection of insect-transmitted plant pathogens, specifically the whitefly-transmitted Begomoviruses that threaten many of the subsistence crops worldwide (Czosnek et al, 2017; Moffat 1999: Polston and Andersen 1997: Rosario, et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study applied this emerging technology to the detection of insect-transmitted plant pathogens, specifically the whitefly-transmitted Begomoviruses that threaten many of the subsistence crops worldwide (Czosnek et al, 2017; Moffat 1999: Polston and Andersen 1997: Rosario, et al, 2014). Some of the advantages being realized are the ability to capture and detect diseases as bioaerosols, thus reducing the time and costs associated with monitoring disease presences or spread (Roux et al, 2013). Reducing costs and time in detection are critical components in the management of viral pathogens in humans (Cowling et al, 2013; Kormunth et al, 2018; Paynter 2015), but also when trying to manage and detect pathogens in urban or agricultural settings (Brodie et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different types of samplers have been developed to overcome the limitations of previous systems, such as the 3-nozzle swirling aerosol collector which collects particles at 12.5 Lpm flow rate by combining impaction and centrifugal motion, called the SKC BioSampler . Roux et al (2013) reported the design of an electrostatic sampler to concentrate biosample for more efficient collection. McFarland et al (2010) designed a high flow rate sampler of 1 250 L/min with wetted cyclone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In principle, a traditional Bio-aerosol Electrostatic Precipitators (ESP) is configured by one discharge electrode and one counter electrode in typical wire-tocylinder [3] where discharge electrode is to generate unipolar charge while the counter one is to define the electric field in parallel with or normal to the aerosol flow and also acted as the sampling electrode to collect particles. Since the conventional ESP creates considerably high charge, it is not suitable for bio-sampling.…”
Section: Working Principlementioning
confidence: 99%