2015
DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.201413214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of a Mid-crustal Conductor in the North Gjallar Ridge, Offshore Norway, Inferred from Magnetotelluric Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Three typical MT responses rotated along the direction of profile P3 are displayed in Figure 4. After processing using the robust multi-station processing scheme of Egbert (1997) combined with a proprietary autogrouping algorithm (Markhus et al, 2015), the 120 stations ( Figure 2) provided good quality MT signal for periods from 1 to 1500 s (Corseri et al, 2015). Subsequently, all 120 stations were used in the inversion phase.…”
Section: Mt Data Acquisition and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Three typical MT responses rotated along the direction of profile P3 are displayed in Figure 4. After processing using the robust multi-station processing scheme of Egbert (1997) combined with a proprietary autogrouping algorithm (Markhus et al, 2015), the 120 stations ( Figure 2) provided good quality MT signal for periods from 1 to 1500 s (Corseri et al, 2015). Subsequently, all 120 stations were used in the inversion phase.…”
Section: Mt Data Acquisition and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this contribution, we carried out 2D inversion of MT data along five profiles ( Figure 2), totalling ~140 km. We obtained good quality MT data from periods 2 to 1500 s, which allow for the investigation of geo-electrical features in the upper continental crust (Corseri et al, 2015). To support the 2D inversion approach and the recovery of abnormally low resistivity (< 0.8 Ω.m) at mid-crustal depths, we performed a dimensionality and electromagnetic strike analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%