2022
DOI: 10.5194/amt-2022-253
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of 3D-effects for UV/vis satellite and ground based observations of volcanic plumes

Abstract: Abstract. We investigate effects of the 3-dimensional (3D) structure of volcanic plumes on the retrieval results of satellite and ground based UV-vis observations. For the analysis of such measurements usually 1D scenarios are assumed (the atmospheric properties only depend on altitude). While 1D assumptions are well suited for the analysis of many atmospheric phenomena, they are usually less appropriate for narrow trace gas plumes. For UV/vis satellite instruments with large ground pixel sizes like GOME-2, SC… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(31 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The quality of the retrieval mainly depends on variations in surface reflectivity, solar zenith angle, atmospheric conditions, proximity to swath edge, 3D effects, while also depending on the retrieval algorithm itself (Fioletov et al., 2020; McCormick et al., 2013; Wagner et al., 2023). In the literature, the “uncertainty of the retrieval” is generally reported in the form of a single aggregated standard deviation “ σ ” (after appropriate unit conversion, σ = κ · σ CA , where pixel mass standard deviation σ is expressed in kton and pixel column amount standard deviation σ CA is expressed in Dobson Units).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quality of the retrieval mainly depends on variations in surface reflectivity, solar zenith angle, atmospheric conditions, proximity to swath edge, 3D effects, while also depending on the retrieval algorithm itself (Fioletov et al., 2020; McCormick et al., 2013; Wagner et al., 2023). In the literature, the “uncertainty of the retrieval” is generally reported in the form of a single aggregated standard deviation “ σ ” (after appropriate unit conversion, σ = κ · σ CA , where pixel mass standard deviation σ is expressed in kton and pixel column amount standard deviation σ CA is expressed in Dobson Units).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With TROPOMI, however, pixel size becomes so small that 3D effects of radiative transfer matters. As shown in Wagner et al (2023), horizontal light paths lead to a smearing out of the satellite observations of a confined plume: TVCDs of plume pixels are generally biased low when derived with a 1D AMF, while neighboring pixels are biased high. For a plume of 1 km × 1 km × 1 km, Wagner et al (2023) report a low bias of up to 30 % for NO 2 for the TROPOMI pixel covering the plume.…”
Section: D Effects Of Radiative Transfer For Power Plant Plumesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Wagner et al (2023), horizontal light paths lead to a smearing out of the satellite observations of a confined plume: TVCDs of plume pixels are generally biased low when derived with a 1D AMF, while neighboring pixels are biased high. For a plume of 1 km × 1 km × 1 km, Wagner et al (2023) report a low bias of up to 30 % for NO 2 for the TROPOMI pixel covering the plume. Note, however, that this effect is slightly dampened by the spatial integration within 15 km applied in the v2 catalog.…”
Section: D Effects Of Radiative Transfer For Power Plant Plumesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quality of the retrieval mainly depends on variations in surface reflectivity, solar zenith angle, atmospheric conditions, proximity to swath edge, 3D effects, while also depending on the retrieval algorithm itself (McCormick et al, 2013;Fioletov et al, 2020;Wagner et al, 2023). In the literature, the "uncertainty of the retrieval" is generally reported in the form of a single aggregated standard deviation "σ" (after appropriate unit conversion, σ = κ.σ CA , where pixel mass standard deviation σ is expressed in kton and pixel column amount standard deviation σ CA is expressed in Dobson Units).…”
Section: Spatially-averaged Background Noisementioning
confidence: 99%