1996
DOI: 10.1016/0091-3057(95)02051-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation into the role of histamine receptors in rodent antinociception

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…H 1 and H 2 receptors are thought to mediate this effect (Thoburn et al, 1994;Braga et al, 1996;Lamberti et al, 1996). Related to pain relief, H 2 receptors in the brain are activated as part of opioid and nonopioid antinociceptive mechanisms , especially when stress elicits or enhances these responses (Nalwalk and Hough, 1995).…”
Section: Antinociceptive Profile For Brain Histaminementioning
confidence: 99%
“…H 1 and H 2 receptors are thought to mediate this effect (Thoburn et al, 1994;Braga et al, 1996;Lamberti et al, 1996). Related to pain relief, H 2 receptors in the brain are activated as part of opioid and nonopioid antinociceptive mechanisms , especially when stress elicits or enhances these responses (Nalwalk and Hough, 1995).…”
Section: Antinociceptive Profile For Brain Histaminementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knockout mice lacking the histamine H 1 R showed significantly fewer responses to nociceptive stimuli compared to wild-type mice [11] . Other studies concerning histamine agonists and antagonists have demonstrated that these drugs can have different effects on the nociceptive threshold depending on their affinity for the histamine receptors and, therefore, on the administered dose [12][13][14] . Higher sensitivity to noxious stimuli was found after using a selective H 1 R agonist [15,16] , and modulation of nociception was demonstrated via activation of the H 2 R [12,17] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…routes of administration. To assess whether metoprine-induced antinociception was actually due to inhibition of histamine-N-methyltransferase, the use of antagonists for H 1 -or H 2 -receptors seemed not to be the most adequate means, because of their low selectivity among histamine receptors (Schwartz et al 1991;Lamberti et al 1996), and the reported antinociceptive activity for both H 1 -and H 2 -blockers (Rumore and Schlichting 1985;Netti et al 1988;Abacioglu et al 1993). On the contrary, the inhibition of endogenous histamine release by activation of the H 3 -autoreceptor with its agonist, (R)-a-methylhistamine, seemed a more appropriate approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, naloxone, administered at a dose able to antagonize completely morphine antinociception (Lamberti et al 1996), prevented the rise in the basal nociceptive threshold induced by dimethyl sulfoxide but did not affect the hot plate values of mice treated with both doses of BW 301 U. The lack of effect of (R)-a-methylhistamine on the rise in pain threshold induced by dimethyl sulfoxide, which resembles its inability to alter morphine-induced antinociception, rules out a nonspecific effect of the H 3 -receptor agonist and supports the hypothesis of BW 301 U antinociception deriving from histamine-N-methyltransferase inhibition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation