1989
DOI: 10.1016/s0034-5288(18)31189-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation into the principal determinants of effective captive bolt stunning of sheep

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…with the cranium and damage produced by passage of the bolt through the brain, 16 but the relative contribution of these two factors to clinical outcome remains unresolved.…”
Section: Scientificmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with the cranium and damage produced by passage of the bolt through the brain, 16 but the relative contribution of these two factors to clinical outcome remains unresolved.…”
Section: Scientificmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In human head injury, brain damage frequently, but not inevitably, accompanies skull fracture (7). While reversible or intractable dysfunction of the reticular activating system (RAS) is the substrate of unconsciousness, a penetrating captive bolt striking the cranium is considered to be the major determinant of effective stunning rather than the passage of the bolt through the brain parenchyma (8). In the present study, the concussive force associated with the impact of the mushroom head of the stunner on the skull probably also contributed substantially to RAS damage and loss of consciousness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…This finding applies specifically to the CBG/ cartridge combination used in this study (Cash Special with 2.5 gr cartridge). Previous studies have suggested that it is the kinetic energy imparted to the cranium by the bolt that produces insensibility (Daly & Whittington, 1989), while the actual physical damage by the bolt to specific brain structures is responsible for producing irrecoverable A B Fig. 1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%