1974
DOI: 10.1147/rd.182.0125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation into Scheduling for an Interactive Computing System

Abstract: This paper describes a statistical evaluation of the performance of the swap scheduling algorithm of an interactive computer system and an investigation into foreground-background scheduling to improve system performance. Input traffic. computer service time demands. and system performance were statistically analyzed. Based on the results of these analyses performance enhancements for the system were determined and then evaluated through use of a validated simulation model.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Examples of a histogram and a box plot are given in Figures 3 and 4, respectively; both taken from Lowery (1996). Examples of behavior graphs, taken from Anderson and Sargent (1974), are given in Figures 5 and 6. A variety of graphs are required that use different types of (1) measures such as the mean, variance, maximum, distribution, and times series of the variables, and (2) relationships between (a) two measures of a single variable (see Figure 5) and (b) measures of two variables (see Figure 6).…”
Section: Graphical Comparisons Of Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Examples of a histogram and a box plot are given in Figures 3 and 4, respectively; both taken from Lowery (1996). Examples of behavior graphs, taken from Anderson and Sargent (1974), are given in Figures 5 and 6. A variety of graphs are required that use different types of (1) measures such as the mean, variance, maximum, distribution, and times series of the variables, and (2) relationships between (a) two measures of a single variable (see Figure 5) and (b) measures of two variables (see Figure 6).…”
Section: Graphical Comparisons Of Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important that appropriate measures and relationships be used in validating a simulation model and that they be determined with respect to the model's intended purpose. See Anderson and Sargent (1974) and Lowery (1996) for other examples of sets of graphs used in the validation of simulation models. These graphs can be used in model validation in different ways.…”
Section: Graphical Comparisons Of Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(See Sargent (1996aSargent ( , 2001b Lowery (1996). Examples of behavior graphs, taken from Anderson and Sargent (1974), are given in Figures 6 and 7. A variety of graphs are required that use different types of (1) measures such as the mean, variance, maximum, distribution, and times series of the variables, and (2) relationships between (a) two measures of a single variable (see Figure 6) and (b) measures of two variables (see Figure 7).…”
Section: Graphical Comparisons Of Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important that appropriate measures and relationships be used in validating a simulation model and that they be determined with respect to the model's intended purpose. See Anderson and Sargent (1974) and Lowery (1996) for examples of sets of graphs used in the validation of two different simulation models. …”
Section: Graphical Comparisons Of Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To illustrate behavior graphs, we consider a simulation model of an interactive computer system in Anderson and Sargent (1974) where behavior graphs were used to validate the model. Three behavior graphs they used are presented in Figures 8, 9 and 10.…”
Section: Box Plots As Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%