2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-006-0759-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation into electrochemical micromachining (EMM) through response surface methodology based approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is recognized that the negative value of ROC is physically meaningless, however, this value is regarded only as the optimal solution of the mathematical model. Although it was observed by Munda and Bhattacharyya (2008) that the mathematical model for ROC prediction is statistically adequate at 97.5% confidence level, it is observed that there is no guarantee that the model will yield meaningful predictions over the entire experimentally investigated range. …”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It is recognized that the negative value of ROC is physically meaningless, however, this value is regarded only as the optimal solution of the mathematical model. Although it was observed by Munda and Bhattacharyya (2008) that the mathematical model for ROC prediction is statistically adequate at 97.5% confidence level, it is observed that there is no guarantee that the model will yield meaningful predictions over the entire experimentally investigated range. …”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Figure 4 shows the convergence of DSA and GA for the considered two responses. As Munda and Bhattacharyya (2008) did not perform any single objective optimization of the responses, so the optimal solutions as achieved applying DSA cannot be compared with those of the past researchers. The effects of various EMM process parameters on MRR and ROC are also observed through the developed scatter diagrams and the trends exactly match with those identified by Munda and Bhattacharyya (2008).…”
Section: Single Objective Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of the minimum objective function (Z 2 ) is found as -0.0810. Munda and Bhattacharyya (2008) determined the maximum MRR value as 0.700 g/min and minimum ROC value as around 20μm at the optimal parametric combination of pulse on/off ratio = 1.0, machining voltage = 3 V, electrolyte concentration = 15g/l, voltage frequency = 42.118Hz and tool vibration frequency = 300 Hz. Thus, it can be claimed that while using DSA, the value of MRR is increased from 0.700 g/min to 0.8354 g/min and the ROC value is drastically reduced from 20μm to 9μm.…”
Section: Multi-objective Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is the reverse of electroplating. The several advantages of ECM is no tool wear, stress-free, high throughput, smooth surfaces, and the ability to machine complex shapes in materials regardless of their hardness or whether they are heat-resistant materials [1]. In through-mask EMM, a photo resist patterned metal workpiece is made an anode in an electrochemical cell such that the exposed metal surface is removed by high-rate anodic metal dissolution by passing an external current.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%