2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-014-6194-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation into a geometry-based model for surface roughness prediction in vibratory finishing processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The transversal impact generally favors the mechanical attrition of the surface deviations, and the normal impact results in the transferring of compressive stresses on the surface due to the plastic deformation. As a result, the post-processing using the VSF process significantly enhances the surface characteristics by reducing the surface roughness and improving the mechanical strength [12]. In this study, both cubical and tension test specimens were subjected to different VSF treatment duration for surface integrity enhancement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transversal impact generally favors the mechanical attrition of the surface deviations, and the normal impact results in the transferring of compressive stresses on the surface due to the plastic deformation. As a result, the post-processing using the VSF process significantly enhances the surface characteristics by reducing the surface roughness and improving the mechanical strength [12]. In this study, both cubical and tension test specimens were subjected to different VSF treatment duration for surface integrity enhancement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Robot-guided drag finishing using an industrial six-axis robot was developed, in which the workpieces are guided through the resting or vibrating abrasive. This method may improve the reachability of the abrasives [43,44].…”
Section: Vibratory Finishing and Drag Finishingmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Hashimoto (1995) developed a simple, empirically-based model of the early transient and long-time-scale steady material removal periods that characterize vibratory finishing processes. Focusing on localized surface features, and the rate at which material is removed from these features, Uhlmann et al (2014) developed a model that predicts the time required to obtain specific surface finishes. Naeini and Spelt (2009) used the discrete element method (DEM) to model media flow within a modified vibratory system, while Domblesky et al (2004), considering the cutting action of media, developed a material removal model, applicable to the long-time-scale period of slow, nominally steady mass removal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%