2021
DOI: 10.3390/ma14020410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation and Optimization of the SLM and WEDM Processes’ Parameters for the AlSi10Mg-Sintered Part

Abstract: Presented study concerns the issue of processing the AlSi10Mg aluminum alloy with a use of WEDM technology. Two types of samples tested during the experiment were previously produced in SLM and in casting processes. The aim of the research was to determine the dependence of the input parameters of SLM (laser scanning speed) and WEDM (current amplitude) processes on the performance of the WEDM process as well as on the roughness of the cut surfaces. The experiment was carried out on a specially prepared test st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To obtain a homogenous surface and a reduced roughness, the process parameters which scan the outer boundary of parts should be optimized for each type of powder material. ANOVA method offers the opportunity to optimize the process parameters by obtaining an empiric mathematical model through mathematical combinations, statistical techniques, and the response surface methodology [41]. In addition, a common practice for post-processing the surfaces of the SLM parts are sandblasting with alumina, polishing with carborundum and ultrasonication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To obtain a homogenous surface and a reduced roughness, the process parameters which scan the outer boundary of parts should be optimized for each type of powder material. ANOVA method offers the opportunity to optimize the process parameters by obtaining an empiric mathematical model through mathematical combinations, statistical techniques, and the response surface methodology [41]. In addition, a common practice for post-processing the surfaces of the SLM parts are sandblasting with alumina, polishing with carborundum and ultrasonication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, efforts are still being made to improve its performance, parameters and the accuracy of the manufactured shapes. Experimental research is still being done to increase material removal rate (MRR), reduce tool wear (TW), and reduce surface roughness (SR) [2][3][4]. Additionally micro-holes requires high dimensional and shape accuracy without burrs and micro-cracks [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the complexity of the physical phenomena occurring in the SLM process, identifying the impact of parameters such as laser power, scan speed, scan strategy, hatch spacing, and material or powder particles on the surface integrity and the geometric accuracy of the manufacturing parts [5][6][7][8][9] is difficult. The research conducted on the optimization of the SLM process [10][11][12][13] improved the properties of the manufactured parts; however, achieving a roughness below 1 micron, which is very often required in industrial applications, is still a challenge. Despite the many advantages of using SLM in the production of parts for the aerospace or power industry [14,15], the high surface roughness, dimensional and geometric inaccuracy [16,17], defects of surface layers such as balling effect [18,19], power adhesion [20], and microcracks [21,22] in many cases require the use of additional post-processing technologies [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%