2022
DOI: 10.1364/oe.459877
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation and direct observation of sidewall leakage current of InGaN-Based green micro-light-emitting diodes

Abstract: Electrical and optical characteristics of InGaN-based green micro-light-emitting diodes (µLEDs) with different active areas are investigated; results are as follows. Reverse and forward leakage currents of µLED increase as emission area is reduced owing to the non-radiative recombination process at the sidewall defects; this is more prominent in smaller µLED because of larger surface-to-volume ratio. Leakage currents of µLEDs deteriorate the carrier injection to light-emitting quantum wells, thereby degrading … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, for standard LEDs (e.g., > 300 µm square) and even recently reported µLEDs, p-GaN contact metal layer (ITO or Ni/Au) is deposited after mesa etching. This indicates that the alignment causes the occurrence of the space between p-contact and mesa [11][12][13]. As presented in Figure 1, the difference in PPI between a sample with 300 µm-size ITO and mesa (~84 PPI) and a sample with 300 µm ITO and 306 µm mesa (i.e., 3 µm spacer) (~82.3 PPI) is not significant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Meanwhile, for standard LEDs (e.g., > 300 µm square) and even recently reported µLEDs, p-GaN contact metal layer (ITO or Ni/Au) is deposited after mesa etching. This indicates that the alignment causes the occurrence of the space between p-contact and mesa [11][12][13]. As presented in Figure 1, the difference in PPI between a sample with 300 µm-size ITO and mesa (~84 PPI) and a sample with 300 µm ITO and 306 µm mesa (i.e., 3 µm spacer) (~82.3 PPI) is not significant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This indicates that the alignment causes the occurrence of the space between p‐contact and mesa. [ 11–13 ] As presented in Figure , the difference in PPI between a sample with 300 µm‐size ITO and mesa (≈84 PPI) and a sample with 300 µm ITO and 306 µm mesa (i.e., 3 µm spacer; ≈82.3 PPI) is not significant. This behavior changes when the LED size gets smaller.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, there is a constant driving force to utilize µLEDs for high-resolution display due to their inherent advantages arising from inorganic materials. Various methods have been introduced to alleviate and overcome the size-dependent external quantum efficiency (EQE) reduction issue, such as chemical etching and aluminum oxide passivation by atomic layer deposition (ALD), wet reaction hydrogen, and sulfur-based passivation (2,3). Recently, the passivation approach with sol-gel method exhibited most effective passivation of sidewall defects so far than ALD-based process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%