Investigating Users’ Decision-Making Process While Searching Online and Their Shortcuts Towards Understanding

Tibau, Marcelo; Siqueira, Sean W. M.; Nunes, Bernardo Pereira; Bortoluzzi, Maria; Marenzi, Ivana; Kemkes, Philipp

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-96565-9_6

Cited by 7 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…From the behavioral perspective, the use of techniques to reinforce search behavior, which is learningrelated (Harasim, 2011). From the cognitivist perspective, it is usually concerned IX Congresso Brasileiro de Informática na Educação (CBIE 2020) Anais do XXXI Simpósio Brasileiro de Informática na Educação (SBIE 2020) (Lu and Hsiao, 2017), (Zhuang et al, 2016), (Mao et al, 2016), (Moraes et al, 2018), (Wilson and Wilson, 2013) Cognitivist (Kodama et al, 2017), (Moraes et al, 2018), (Taibi et al, 2017), (Wilson et al, 2016), (Syed and Collins-Thompson, 2016), (Bhattacharya and Gwizdka, 2019), (Al-Tawil et al, 2019), (Azpiazu et al, 2017), (Crescenzi, 2016), (Han et al, 2019), (Liu and Song, 2018), (Johnson, 2018), (Jansen et al, 2007), (Smith and Rieh, 2019) Constructivist (Ghosh et al, 2018), (Tibau et al, 2018b), (Freund et al, 2016), (Komlodi and Caidi, 2016), (Weingart and Eickhoff, 2016), (Tibau et al, 2018a), (Yu et al, 2018b), (Al-Tawil et al, 2019) (Ibieta et al, 2019), (Zapata et al, 2015), (Zhang, 2017), (Meyers, 2018), (Cho et al, 2017), (Vakkari et al, 2019), (Ibieta et al, 2019) about information processing, search complexity and cognitive effort. From the constructivist perspective, it can be focused on what the learner can or cannot do without help, known as the zone of proximal development (Vygotsky et al, 1978).…”

Section: Learning Paradigms (Lp)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Table 3 summarizes papers according to the mechanisms influencing the learning process in the literature. (Taibi et al, 2017), (Gadiraju, 2018), (Zhuang et al, 2016), (Yu et al, 2018a), (Gadiraju et al, 2018) Evaluation (Rieh et al, 2012), (Tibau et al, 2018b), (Liu and Song, 2018), (Johnson, 2018), (Smith and Rieh, 2019), (Wilson and Wilson, 2013), (Vakkari et al, 2019) Assistance or guidance (Han et al, 2019), (Hinostroza et al, 2018), (Cho et al, 2017), (Moraes et al, 2018), (Ibieta et al, 2019) 3. Session Design for Learning (SDL): Represents the structural, environmental and interactive features of the session that are used to support and ensure learning.…”

Section: Learning Paradigms (Lp)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Summary of the studies according to sessions designed for learning. (Kodama et al, 2017), (Freund et al, 2016), (Azpiazu et al, 2017), (Gadiraju, 2018), (Komlodi and Caidi, 2016), (Mao et al, 2016), (Weingart and Eickhoff, 2016), (Bhattacharya and Gwizdka, 2019) (Han et al, 2019), (Hinostroza et al, 2018), (Gadiraju et al, 2018), (Gadiraju et al, 2018), (Cho et al, 2017), (Wilson and Wilson, 2013), (Ibieta et al, 2019) Not Controlled Session (Han et al, 2019), (Johnson, 2018), (Vakkari et al, 2019) Individual Session (Han et al, 2019), (Meyers, 2018), (Gadiraju et al, 2018), (Gadiraju et al, 2018), (Cho et al, 2017), (Wilson and Wilson, 2013), (Vakkari et al, 2019), (Ibieta et al, 2019) Group Session (Meyers, 2018), (Moraes et al, 2018) Community-centered (Liu and Song, 2018) Knowledge-centric (Yu et al, 2018a), (Tibau et al, 2018b), (Zapata et al, 2015), (Gadiraju et al, 2018), (Smith and Rieh, 2019), (Wilson and Wilson, 2013) Student-centric (Han et al, 2019), (Meyers, 2018), (Gadiraju et al, 2018), (Moraes et al, 2018), (Vakkari...…”

Section: Recognizing Knowledge Gainmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Han et al (2019) proposed a classification system for novice users' mental models. Tibau et al (2018b) investigated the decisionmaking process, which supports the understanding of the learner's progress. Classical evaluations still predominate to measure the learning gain during the search process, evidenced by the use of pre-and post-session tests (Meyers, 2018).…”

Section: Sdl Studies Controlled Sessionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…MRL Studies Pre and post-tests (Rieh et al, 2012), (Meyers, 2018), (Gadiraju et al, 2018), (Cho et al, 2017) Assisted Process (Johnson, 2018), (Hinostroza et al, 2018), (Vakkari et al, 2019), (Ibieta et al, 2019) Knowledge base (Yu et al, 2018a), (Tibau et al, 2018b), (Liu and Song, 2018), (Gadiraju et al, 2018) Ontologies or taxonomies (Jansen et al, 2007), (Moraes et al, 2018), (Wilson and Wilson, 2013) Cognition or mind models (Han et al, 2019), (Smith and Rieh, 2019)…”

Section: Table 5 Classification Of Measurement Records Of Learning (mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Investigating the learning perspective of Searching as Learning, a review of the state of the art

Gimenez¹,

Machado²,

Pinelli³

et al. 2020

Anais Do XXXI Simpósio Brasileiro De Informática Na Educação (SBIE 2020)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Current search engines are not designed to facilitate learning as they do not lead the user to develop more complex skills. Searching as Learning (SAL) emerged as a research area from the intersection of information search and learning technologies in order to advance the study of searching as a learning process. However, we wonder how have the learning theories and approaches been explored in SAL. Through a systematic review of the literature, we identified 65 papers that report SAL solutions. We analyzed them, seeking to answer (i) which learning theories, approaches and methods support the searching as a learning process, and (ii) what metrics, procedures, or treatments were used to measure learning during the searching process. We uncover the learning perspective in the SAL literature, discussing the learning paradigms, the mechanisms influencing the learning process, the search session design for learning and the knowledge gain measurement strategies.

show abstract