Investigating the viscoelastic and hysteresis behavior of nano silica/carbon black hybrid reinforced styrene‐butadiene rubber vulcanizates via surface silanization
Abstract:With the thought of green tires and the need of replacing carbon reinforcing fillers with noncarbon silica filler, the effectiveness of silane surface modification on dispersion state, dynamic viscoelastic, hysteresis, and abrasion resistance of SBR vulcanizates filled with a hybrid of carbon black (CB)/nano SiO 2 is investigated. In situ surface modification of nano SiO 2 is carried out using bis-(γ-triethoxysilylpropyl)-tetrasulfide (TESPT), and various compounds with different ratios of CB/SiO 2 are prepare… Show more
“…Also, due to the less potent van der Waals force at CB nanoparticles' surface compared to that of silica ones, CB can establish more extensive, powerful filler−rubber interfaces (carbon black−rubber covalent bonds (CRCBs)) with SBR, further restricting SBR chains' motion and relaxation. 16,39 As a result, it was not shocking to figure out that CB acted as the best reinforcement for SBR, and the C20 sample is the best performer in terms of mechanical properties; it also can be verified by the results that the highest M300 (Young's modulus at 300% elongation), tensile strength, hardness, and tear strength belong to the C20 sample.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This phenomenon is counted as one of the rationales behind the inferiority of nanosilica-filled nanocomposites to that of CB-filled in terms of technical properties. 16 Among silica-containing nanocomposites, the best performance in mechanical properties is displayed by the R20 sample. Due to the minor quantity of GNSi agglomerates that have existed within R20 rather than those 1F ones in 1F20, more resilient, wide-ranging, abundant GNSi−TESPT−rubber bridges (GTRBs) were created; this provides the better act of SBR molecules' motion prevention through the declared mechanism imposed by GNSi nanoparticles.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a general rule, nanosilica-reinforced nanocomposites can establish more robust physical interfacial networks within the SBR matrix, bringing about more mechanical inferiority, which is exposed as the extra energy required to dissociate the mentioned networks, than CB-filled nanocomposites. This phenomenon is counted as one of the rationales behind the inferiority of nanosilica-filled nanocomposites to that of CB-filled in terms of technical properties . Among silica-containing nanocomposites, the best performance in mechanical properties is displayed by the R20 sample.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, not only was wet grip and rolling resistance improved in the nanocomposite containing TESPT but its glass transition temperature ( T g ) was also elevated. Similarly, Kalantari et al suggested that incorporating the silane as the modifying agent improved the viscoelasticity performance of silica-having rubber vulcanizates by a positively thriving cross-linking degree inside the SBR matrix. Lin et al demonstrated the effects of silica/graphene (SG) hybrids on the SBR matrix.…”
Upcycling is a pioneering step towards a lesspolluted planet. Accordingly, a recycled nanosilica (GNSi) was exploited to replace health-hazardous carbon black (CB)�a primary component of tires worldwide�and fabricate green styrene−butadiene rubber (SBR) nanocomposites to employ in the tire manufacturing industry with comparable or even better technical properties to that of CB-containing ones. Two fresh, commercially available nanosilica, 1F and 2F, were also used for comparison. To study the silica characteristics and the behavior they brought about inside SBR matrixes, field-emission scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, Brunauer−Emmett−Teller, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, mechanical and rheological vulcanization testing, and dynamic mechanical thermal analysis methods were applied. The findings revealed that there was almost no noticeable performance gap between the nanocomposite loaded with 20 parts per hundred rubbers (phr) of CB and the one with the exact content of GNSi modified with bis(triethoxysilylpropyl)tetrasulfide. Utilizing GNSi, not only does the vehicle consume less fossil fuel but it also eliminates a solid waste disposal source that poses a risk to the environment. The observed enhancements, such as modulus by 15% and tear strength by 30% in the nanocomposite with 20 phr of GNSi than the one with the same concentration of 1F, indicate GNSi a more successful rubber strengthening nanomaterial than 1F. Incorporating GNSi also enhanced the technical properties more noticeably than 2F. Therefore, GNSi is offered as an appropriate, feasible additive for SBR, contributing to the development of green tires.
“…Also, due to the less potent van der Waals force at CB nanoparticles' surface compared to that of silica ones, CB can establish more extensive, powerful filler−rubber interfaces (carbon black−rubber covalent bonds (CRCBs)) with SBR, further restricting SBR chains' motion and relaxation. 16,39 As a result, it was not shocking to figure out that CB acted as the best reinforcement for SBR, and the C20 sample is the best performer in terms of mechanical properties; it also can be verified by the results that the highest M300 (Young's modulus at 300% elongation), tensile strength, hardness, and tear strength belong to the C20 sample.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This phenomenon is counted as one of the rationales behind the inferiority of nanosilica-filled nanocomposites to that of CB-filled in terms of technical properties. 16 Among silica-containing nanocomposites, the best performance in mechanical properties is displayed by the R20 sample. Due to the minor quantity of GNSi agglomerates that have existed within R20 rather than those 1F ones in 1F20, more resilient, wide-ranging, abundant GNSi−TESPT−rubber bridges (GTRBs) were created; this provides the better act of SBR molecules' motion prevention through the declared mechanism imposed by GNSi nanoparticles.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a general rule, nanosilica-reinforced nanocomposites can establish more robust physical interfacial networks within the SBR matrix, bringing about more mechanical inferiority, which is exposed as the extra energy required to dissociate the mentioned networks, than CB-filled nanocomposites. This phenomenon is counted as one of the rationales behind the inferiority of nanosilica-filled nanocomposites to that of CB-filled in terms of technical properties . Among silica-containing nanocomposites, the best performance in mechanical properties is displayed by the R20 sample.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, not only was wet grip and rolling resistance improved in the nanocomposite containing TESPT but its glass transition temperature ( T g ) was also elevated. Similarly, Kalantari et al suggested that incorporating the silane as the modifying agent improved the viscoelasticity performance of silica-having rubber vulcanizates by a positively thriving cross-linking degree inside the SBR matrix. Lin et al demonstrated the effects of silica/graphene (SG) hybrids on the SBR matrix.…”
Upcycling is a pioneering step towards a lesspolluted planet. Accordingly, a recycled nanosilica (GNSi) was exploited to replace health-hazardous carbon black (CB)�a primary component of tires worldwide�and fabricate green styrene−butadiene rubber (SBR) nanocomposites to employ in the tire manufacturing industry with comparable or even better technical properties to that of CB-containing ones. Two fresh, commercially available nanosilica, 1F and 2F, were also used for comparison. To study the silica characteristics and the behavior they brought about inside SBR matrixes, field-emission scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, Brunauer−Emmett−Teller, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, mechanical and rheological vulcanization testing, and dynamic mechanical thermal analysis methods were applied. The findings revealed that there was almost no noticeable performance gap between the nanocomposite loaded with 20 parts per hundred rubbers (phr) of CB and the one with the exact content of GNSi modified with bis(triethoxysilylpropyl)tetrasulfide. Utilizing GNSi, not only does the vehicle consume less fossil fuel but it also eliminates a solid waste disposal source that poses a risk to the environment. The observed enhancements, such as modulus by 15% and tear strength by 30% in the nanocomposite with 20 phr of GNSi than the one with the same concentration of 1F, indicate GNSi a more successful rubber strengthening nanomaterial than 1F. Incorporating GNSi also enhanced the technical properties more noticeably than 2F. Therefore, GNSi is offered as an appropriate, feasible additive for SBR, contributing to the development of green tires.
“…Therefore, a hybrid filler system of CB and nano‐silica has been proposed as a promising way to combine the advantages of both fillers and overcome their disadvantages. The use of CB in combination with silica has been widely studied and previously reported 16–31 …”
This study investigates the efficiency of already developed surface‐modified carbon black (CB), both independently and in conjunction with nano‐silica, as a hybrid filler, to the properties of natural rubber (NR) compounds. The modification process, followed by coupling agent treatment, enhanced cross‐link density and curing characteristics, though the inclusion of nano‐silica alone negatively affected curing due to its inherent polarity and tendency to agglomerate. The filled compounds with modified CB exhibited significant improvements in mechanical properties, notably tear resistance. Moreover, the combination of nano‐silica with modified CB yielded compounds with superior tear resistance, attributed to synergistic effects. CB surface modification exhibited varying effects on the glass transition temperature, with enhancements observed in tan δ at lower temperatures, indicating improved ice and wet grip potential. Also, it reduced rolling resistance after treatment with a coupling agent. While thermal stability remained consistent across the studied compounds, swelling resistance varies with filler type and ratio. Thermodynamic analysis confirmed the positive impact of CB surface modification on the elasticity and chain mobility of the investigated rubber compounds. It was concluded that the strategic selection of fillers and modification approaches were essential for achieving optimal results in the rubber compound's performance and application.
The calendering process of pole piece is a key step affecting the performance of the power battery. In the calendaring process, rubber roller materials will produce hysteresis heat, resulting in rolling resistance, which will lead to energy loss. The thermo‐mechanical coupling model for calendering rubber roller has been established and the effects of materials, calendering speeds, and roller structure shape on the viscoelastic temperature rise of rubber roller were analyzed. Solution‐polymerized styrene–butadiene rubber (SSBR) materials with different fillers have the greatest impact on temperature rise, followed by the roller shape, and calendering speed is smaller. The loss modulus of SSBR filled with white carbon black studied was smaller, and the temperature rise at high speed was 14.5°C higher than that at low speed. The optimized roller shape has a temperature rise of 10.4°C lower than the original shape. The research results could provide reference for the calendering rubber roller design of pole piece and similar processing.Highlights
A thermo‐mechanical coupling model of calendering rubber roller was established.
The rubber roller made of SSBR‐VN3 has a lower temperature rise.
Optimized structure reduced contact pressure by 28.1% and temperature rise by 10.4°C.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.