2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2022.127365
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating the trade-off between self-quarantine and forced quarantine provisions to control an epidemic: An evolutionary approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(89 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of the game between the government and individuals, Khan et al. [29] further complements the limitations of previous scholars. Their topic is fascinating.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In terms of the game between the government and individuals, Khan et al. [29] further complements the limitations of previous scholars. Their topic is fascinating.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…How solve this contradiction (or finding an equilibrium between these two points) is a significant question for future research. A new research issue comes from [ 29 , 30 , 55 ], which proposes that SED is a critical way to solve social efficiency (welfare). In the case of public health emergencies, how to maximize social welfare through government decision-making is an important research direction in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also demonstrated the impact of the new strain's introduction on disease dynamics and individual vaccination behavior, as well as the total vaccine coverage considering the time delay. The concept of social efficiency deficit (SED), which is the difference between Nash equilibrium (NE) and the social optimum, is incorporated into our model (SO), to generate a social dilemma, taking into account the vaccine's efficacy and cost ( Ariful Kabir & Tanimoto, 2019 ; Kabir et al., 2021 ; Tori & Tanimoto, 2022 ; Tanimoto, 2019 ; Tanimoto, 2015 ; Tanimoto, 2021 ; Arefin, Kabir, Jusup, Ito, & Tanimoto, 2020 ; Huang, Wang, & Xia, 2020 ; wang & Xia, 2020 ; Khan, Arefin, & Tanimoto, 2022a ; Khan, Arefin, & Tanimoto, 2022b ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome these limitations, the impact of disease spreading (and its prevention) has also been studied on different social network structures. Here, the interactions between individuals are modeled as the links in a social network whose nodes are the individuals themselves [19] , [20] . Whether diseases, computer viruses or rumors, their spread is inevitably influenced by the topology and structure of the social network [21] , [22] , [23] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%