2011
DOI: 10.1002/jor.21436
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating the role of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells in regulating the osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells in vitro

Abstract: Significant progress has been made in understanding the hematopoietic supportive capacity of both mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and osteogenic cells in maintaining hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) in vitro. However the role of HSPCs in regulating their bone marrow niche environment through influencing the function of neighboring cell populations to complete this reciprocal relationship is not well understood. In this study, we investigated the influence of HSPCs on the osteogenic differentiation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
25
1
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(54 reference statements)
2
25
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, unlike previous studies, there was also an increase in late osteogenic markers (calcium) compared with the control group (osteogenic). Importantly, and in contrast to previous studies, 37,[40][41][42][43][44][46][47][48][49]69 this increase in ALP and calcium content was achieved in a 3D scaffoldless construct, without the use of any osteogenic supplements. When compared with the calcium content results, 49 the increase in calcium content in the coculture group with added MSCs/ HUVECs, but no osteogenic supplements, was significantly higher than in the same group cultured in osteogenic supplements as reported by Freeman et al 49 There was significantly higher calcium content in the group cultured with osteogenic supplements than in the group without Quantitative analysis of cross-sectional area of the rudimentary vessels present in the aggregates.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, unlike previous studies, there was also an increase in late osteogenic markers (calcium) compared with the control group (osteogenic). Importantly, and in contrast to previous studies, 37,[40][41][42][43][44][46][47][48][49]69 this increase in ALP and calcium content was achieved in a 3D scaffoldless construct, without the use of any osteogenic supplements. When compared with the calcium content results, 49 the increase in calcium content in the coculture group with added MSCs/ HUVECs, but no osteogenic supplements, was significantly higher than in the same group cultured in osteogenic supplements as reported by Freeman et al 49 There was significantly higher calcium content in the group cultured with osteogenic supplements than in the group without Quantitative analysis of cross-sectional area of the rudimentary vessels present in the aggregates.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 89%
“…Moreover, similar to previous studies, 37,[40][41][42][43][44][46][47][48][49]69 the coculture group with both HUVECs and MSCs added had significantly higher ALP production than the control groups (osteogenic and noncoculture group) after 3 weeks of coculture. However, unlike previous studies, there was also an increase in late osteogenic markers (calcium) compared with the control group (osteogenic).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In particular, depending on its composition, ECM retains the capability of either maintaining cell stemness 11 or conversely enhancing the osteogenic potential of MSCs. 12,13 Moreover, the initial cellularity of the samples is another important, but often underestimated factor, further affecting the development of the MSC/scaffold constructs. 14,15 However, neither has the role performed by transient populations been deepened so far, nor have celldynamic biomimetic osteogenic niches been investigated in TE studies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%