Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2007
DOI: 10.1080/09500690601180817
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating the Relationship between Subject Content Knowledge and Pedagogical Practice through the Analysis of Classroom Discourse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
1
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
33
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The implementation of dialogic approaches was mostly limited to the collection of pupil ideas rather than further exploration of these ideas. This may well indicate that student teachers lack confidence in their level of content knowledge (theme 6), an issue in-service teachers struggle with too (Childs & McNicholl, 2007;Colucci-Gray & Fraser, 2008). The student teachers also frequently brought up other reasons as to why dialogic approaches were not adopted with discipline and timing presented as the most important factors (themes 4 & 5).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The implementation of dialogic approaches was mostly limited to the collection of pupil ideas rather than further exploration of these ideas. This may well indicate that student teachers lack confidence in their level of content knowledge (theme 6), an issue in-service teachers struggle with too (Childs & McNicholl, 2007;Colucci-Gray & Fraser, 2008). The student teachers also frequently brought up other reasons as to why dialogic approaches were not adopted with discipline and timing presented as the most important factors (themes 4 & 5).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sanders, Borko and Lockard (1993), Childs and McNicholl (2007), and Gess-Newsome and indicate that possession of specific, specialist SMK background imparts confidence to teachers as they approach within specialism teaching, providing a basis from which to plan and interact with students. Good SMK confers a sense of security, which supports a teacher in devising appropriate PCK.…”
Section: The Relationship Between Pck and Smk: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their weaknesses in SMK thus impacted on their classroom practice. Childs and McNicholl (2007) probed the same issue as Sanders et al (1993) by analysing the discourse used by a single science teacher teaching within and outside specialism. In some respects, they report similar findings -that when the teacher was secure in her SMK, she could explain the science concept she was teaching more fully and accurately, resorting less often to simplistic dialogue based on interaction-response-feedback.…”
Section: Smk and Pck Are Separate Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A framework on explanations research was also incorporated (Mamiala, 2001).When compared to other Sunday papers, Sunday World was found to have a lot of items related to peoples's life challenges hence its choice. Opinions sought from the educators and learners were based on the frameworks described by Ogborn et al (1996), Childs & McNicholl (2007) and Chi (1997). Six learners and five educators (neighbours to the researcher) were purposively selected to seek their views on the categorised newspaper items.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%