2019
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01657
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating the Protective Role of Mastery Imagery Ability in Buffering Debilitative Stress Responses

Abstract: Mastery imagery has been shown to be associated with more positive cognitive and emotional responses to stress, but research is yet to investigate the influence of mastery imagery ability on imagery’s effectiveness in regulating responses to acute stress, such as competition. Furthermore, little research has examined imagery’s effectiveness in response to actual competition. This study examined (a) whether mastery imagery ability was associated with stress response changes to a competitive stress task, a car r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The person-centred FIT for groups approach directly explores specific and general motivational goals (Paivio, 1985) discussed through mutual collaboration with the psychologist and team-mates. These discussions emphasise the importance of selfregulated deliberate practice and emotional control connected with long-term goals, resulting in positive self-imagery which can impact performance (Quinton, Veldhuijzen van Zanten, Trotman, Cumming, & Williams, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The person-centred FIT for groups approach directly explores specific and general motivational goals (Paivio, 1985) discussed through mutual collaboration with the psychologist and team-mates. These discussions emphasise the importance of selfregulated deliberate practice and emotional control connected with long-term goals, resulting in positive self-imagery which can impact performance (Quinton, Veldhuijzen van Zanten, Trotman, Cumming, & Williams, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research examining the explicit use of mastery imagery content during stressful situations (rather than the general ability to image mastery-based content), demonstrates that mastery imagery use tends to have a greater impact on anxiety interpretation than the intensity (Williams et al, 2010 ; Williams and Cumming, 2012a , Williams et al, 2017 ). Furthermore, preliminary results have suggested that increasing mastery imagery ability through an imagery training intervention may be effective in altering anxiety interpretation rather than intensity in relation to psychological stress (Möller, 2018 ). Collectively, this body of work suggests that mastery imagery ability may be important for anxiety intensity at a general level, but more important for anxiety interpretation when the anxiety is in response to a specific stressful situation, event, or task.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the rigorous approach employed, the cross-sectional nature of the work prevents any conclusions of causal relationships existing between variables (Christenfeld et al, 2004 ). Although there is some preliminary data suggesting that improving mastery imagery ability may lead to more positive perceptions of anxiety (Möller, 2018 ), it is important that future research comprehensively examines the effects of increasing mastery imagery ability on anxiety responses and performance during stress. Due to the healthy population in the present study, future research should also examine the hypothesized model in clinical populations (e.g., those with a clinical diagnosis of anxiety) to determine whether the relationship between confidence, mastery imagery ability, anxiety intensity, anxiety interpretation, and performance is similar to that of a non-clinical population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Responses are made on a 7‐point Likert‐type scale ranging from −3 (very debilitative/negative) to +3 (very facilitative/positive) . The IAMS provides definitions to ensure individuals fully understand the meaning of each construct and has been identified as a valid and reliable measure to assess state anxiety (Thomas et al., 2002) and is frequently used to assess state anxiety in laboratory‐based stress studies (Moore, Vine, Wilson, & Freeman, 2012; Quinton, Veldhuijzen van Zanten, Trotman, Cumming, & Williams, 2019; Trotman et al., 2018).…”
Section: Studymentioning
confidence: 99%