2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2018.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating the potentialities of Monte Carlo simulation for assessing soil water content via proximal gamma-ray spectroscopy

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, we adopted a value of Ω = 0.899, estimated on the basis of the specific composition of the soil of the experimental site [30]. If a soil mineralogical analysis lacks, a mean value together with its standard deviation Ω = (0.903 ± 0.011) estimated in [29] can be adopted. The Ω variability is expected to have second order effects on the estimation of gravimetric water content as the variation introduced by different Ω values would be undistinguishable within the ~0.017 kg/kg absolute uncertainty on the estimated w values, which is essentially dominated by the systematic component associated to the S cal and w Cal calibration reference values [36].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, we adopted a value of Ω = 0.899, estimated on the basis of the specific composition of the soil of the experimental site [30]. If a soil mineralogical analysis lacks, a mean value together with its standard deviation Ω = (0.903 ± 0.011) estimated in [29] can be adopted. The Ω variability is expected to have second order effects on the estimation of gravimetric water content as the variation introduced by different Ω values would be undistinguishable within the ~0.017 kg/kg absolute uncertainty on the estimated w values, which is essentially dominated by the systematic component associated to the S cal and w Cal calibration reference values [36].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reference evapotranspiration (ET0) ( Figure 3b) was calculated through the Hargreaves equation [28] by adopting the weather parameters recorded during the data-taking by the agro-meteorological station. A permanent gamma station, specifically designed and built for the experiment, with a 1 L sodium iodide (NaI) crystal was placed inside a steel box mounted on top of a 2.25 m high steel pole [29]. The gamma spectrometer was coupled to a photomultiplier tube base which output is processed by a digital multi-channel analyzer (MCA, CAEN γstream); the whole system was powered by a solar panel ( Figure 4).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future development foresees the analysis of this information. In particular, gamma-rays were found to be correlated to soil moisture as well [45,46], but with a smaller footprint. The fast neutrons and high energy events detected can be used to normalize the incoming galactic fluctuations directly in-situ with the data from the sensor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their signal is attenuated by any material, but particularly by the water molecule. The gamma rays of the corresponding energy window can travel up to 30 cm in the ground and 25 m in the air [321]. Hence, gamma radiation can be a proxy for the average soil water content in the upper root zone [227].…”
Section: Airborne Geophysical Sensors Of Natural Radiation-gamma and mentioning
confidence: 99%