2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.05.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating the passive mechanical behaviour of skeletal muscle fibres: Micromechanical experiments and Bayesian hierarchical modelling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some studies have been able to measure properties of isolated muscle fibres. However, tensile data are only available for the longitudinal direction of the muscle fibres [40], which may not necessarily represent the response in the transverse direction. Ideally, data for the cellular component of the base material would be tensile data for fibre and other cellular components measured transverse to the fibre orientation.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies have been able to measure properties of isolated muscle fibres. However, tensile data are only available for the longitudinal direction of the muscle fibres [40], which may not necessarily represent the response in the transverse direction. Ideally, data for the cellular component of the base material would be tensile data for fibre and other cellular components measured transverse to the fibre orientation.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following calibration, UC and CC slow- A second set of UC and CC finite element models with the same constitutive formulation were calibrated using only the UC fast compression data. This is to reflect the approach of assuming near-incompressibility with a single-parameter bulk hyperelastic term, as is most common in finite element models of skeletal muscle [23], [25], [33], [49], [50]. The volumetric parameters ( ) were assumed to be three, four, and five orders of magnitude larger than the isochoric parameters ( 0 ) to reflect a range of assumptions.…”
Section: Finite Element Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blemker et al used a decoupled strain energy formulation to model the biceps branchii in which the volumetric or bulk parameter is assumed to be five orders of magnitude larger than the isochoric or shear parameters [33]. Similarly, Calvo et al and Grasa et al take the only volumetric parameter to be between two and three orders of magnitude larger than the isochoric parameters [25], [66]. In this study we collect volumetric compression data (CC) and span the assumptions made by Blemker et al and Calvo et al to predict the CC data.…”
Section: Model Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Reference 22, random field models for anisotropic nonlinear elastic material functions, with applications to vascular mechanics, have been presented. One of the authors of the present paper has applied Bayesian inference to analyze the behavior of skeletal muscle fibers under uncertainty 23 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the authors of the present paper has applied Bayesian inference to analyze the behavior of skeletal muscle fibers under uncertainty. 23 In the present work, we consider uncertainty quantification in the context of calibration and computational prediction with isotropic and hyperelastic biomechanical models. We present a comprehensive computational approach, summarized in Figure 1, which allows us to approximate the functional relation between force-displacement responses and isotropic hyperelastic material parameters with a surrogate model and hence, to efficiently calibrate the material model.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%