2018
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b11920
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating the Many Roles of Internal Water in Cytochrome c Oxidase

Abstract: Cytochrome c oxidase (C cO) is the terminal enzyme in the respiratory electron transport chain. As part of its catalytic cycle, C cO transfers protons to its Fe-Cu binuclear center (BNC) to reduce oxygen, and in addition, it pumps protons across the mitochondrial inner, or bacterial, membrane where it is located. It is believed that this proton transport is facilitated by a network of water chains inside the enzyme. Here we present an analysis of the hydration of C cO, including the BNC region, using a semi-em… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
(166 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the MD simulations suggest that the proton acceptor for Y356 is a water molecule in the interfacial region, and presumably this proton is subsequently shuttled to bulk solvent. Water networks allowing redox active enzymes to shuttle protons to solvent have also been characterized computationally in other proteins. , …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the MD simulations suggest that the proton acceptor for Y356 is a water molecule in the interfacial region, and presumably this proton is subsequently shuttled to bulk solvent. Water networks allowing redox active enzymes to shuttle protons to solvent have also been characterized computationally in other proteins. , …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Water networks allowing redox active enzymes to shuttle protons to solvent have also been characterized computationally in other proteins. 57,58 Previously, Y356 and Y731 were proposed to communicate across the interface on the basis of EPR experiments indicating that the local environment around Y356 is influenced by Y731 via mutation studies. 56 However, a direct hydrogen bond between these two residues is not supported by H 1 ENDOR data 44 or the distances in the cryo-EM structure.…”
Section: T H Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Getting the proton to K362 has been considered as an important step/pre-requisite for proton transport through the K-channel [ 9 , 13 , 37 ]. While a number of previous simulation studies suggest a water-mediated hydrogen-bonded network between K362 and Y288 [ 17 , 18 , 20 , 38 ], partially via T359, regardless of K362’s protonation state, with neutral K362 no connectivity with the lower part of the K-channel has been observed [ 18 , 38 ] but with a protonated K362 there is enough water in the lower part to render water chains between K362 and E101 conceivable [ 20 ]. Our simulation data agree in as much as protonated K362 leads to a high connectivity of hydrogen bonds in the upper and lower part of the channel.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hydration levels in the cavities of the BNC and in the proton-conducting channels in CcO have been studied by prediction of internal water sites and molecular dynamics simulations [ 17 , 18 , 19 ]. The formation of water wires or water chains, along which a proton transport can also take place in the channels [ 6 , 14 , 20 ] or from the BNC to the P-side and thus the exterior of the protein has been probed by simulations [ 21 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although we refer to “protons”, H + does not travel alone. Rather it is associated with a water (hydronium, H 3 O + ) or two water molecules as a Zundel cation (H 5 O 2 + ) or as a larger, Eigen complex (H 9 O 4 + ) ( Agmon, 1995 ; Wraight, 2006 ; Farahvash and Stuchebrukhov, 2018 ). In proteins, the proton can also be bound to redox cofactors, to acidic or basic residues or trapped as a stabilized hydronium ( Xu and Voth, 2006 ; Freier et al, 2011 ; Ikeda et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%