Investigating the Management of Geological Hazards and Risks in the Mt Cameroon Area Using Focus Group Discussions

Abstract

The scientific evaluation of hazards and risks remains a primary concern in poorly known volcanic regions. The use of such information to develop an effective risk management structure and risk reduction actions however also poses important challenges. We here present the results of a series of focus group discussions (FGDs) organised with city councillors from three municipalities around Mt Cameroon volcano, Cameroon. The Mt Cameroon area is a volcanically and tectonically active region regularly affected in the historical past by lava flows, landslides and earthquake swarms, and has a potential for crater lake outgassing. The lower flanks of the volcano are densely populated and the site of intense economic development. The FGDs were aimed at the elicitation of (1) the knowledge and perception of geological hazards, (2) the state of preparedness and the implementation of mitigation and prevention actions by the municipalities, (3) the evaluation of the effectiveness of the structure of communication channels established to respond to emergency situations, and (4) the recovery from an emergency. In all three municipalities stakeholders had good knowledge of the risks, except for processes never experienced in the region. They generally grasped the causes of landslides or floods but were less familiar with volcano-tectonic processes. Stakeholders identified the lack of strategic planning to monitor hazards and mitigate their impacts as a major weakness, requesting additional education and scientific support. Response to natural hazards is mostly based on informal communication channels and is supported by a high level of trust between local scientists, decision makers and the population. Actions are taken to raise awareness and implement basic mitigation and prevention actions, based on the willingness of local political leaders. The strong centralisation of the risk management process at the national level and the lack of political and financial means at the local level are major limitations in the implementation of an effective risk management strategy adapted to local risk conditions. Our case study highlights the need for earth and social scientists to actively work together with national and local authorities to translate the findings of scientific hazard and risk assessment into improved risk management practices.

Enhancing resilience against floods in the Lower Motowoh community, Limbe, Southwest Cameroon

“…Actors already taking action to impart positive change: Civil society organizations like GEADIRR and its partners who participated in the VFL project (Aka et al , 2016). Local community members themselves through organize rudimentary community actions/efforts like cleaning of waterways, use of sandbags to prevent landslides, etc. Universities and research institutions via DRR student projects, workshops, focus group discussions (Del Marmol et al , 2017). The DRR focal point in Cameroon is the Department of Civil Protection in the Cameroon Ministry of Interior.…”

“…Universities and research institutions via DRR student projects, workshops, focus group discussions (Del Marmol et al , 2017).…”

Studying Tuff Rings and Volcanic Hazards in a Tropical Setting: The Case of the Batoke Tuff Ring, Limbe, SW Region Cameroon

“…Workers (e.g. [1] [2] [3] [4]) who have attempted to assess the hazard potential of Mt Cameroon often rank the Hawaiian-style eruption that results in long lava flows, as the most common hazard. This is probably because lava flows are more recurrent as against the Strombolian to sub-plinian type eruptions that generate eruption columns and result in ash fall.…”