2020
DOI: 10.1177/2158244020920604
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating the Influence of Different L2 Proficiency Measures on Research Results

Abstract: Researchers have used different measures to examine participants’ second-language (L2) proficiency, yet it remains unclear how these different measures influence research results on the effect of L2 proficiency on the target variable. The present research explored the modulation effect of four different measures of L2 Chinese proficiency on Chinese phonological awareness (PA). Eighty-four L2 learners of Chinese who spoke English or Arabic as their first language completed four different measures of Chinese pro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
33
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(98 reference statements)
6
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the recruited participants came from different universities, thus relying on their course grades was not appropriate. Considering that a variety of measures of L2 proficiency could lead to different research findings (Gardner and MacIntyre, 1993a ; Zhang et al, 2020b ), in keeping with previous studies (Gardner and MacIntyre, 1993a ; Wang and Jiang, 2022 ), the participants' Chinese learning achievement was assessed both objectively and subjectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, the recruited participants came from different universities, thus relying on their course grades was not appropriate. Considering that a variety of measures of L2 proficiency could lead to different research findings (Gardner and MacIntyre, 1993a ; Zhang et al, 2020b ), in keeping with previous studies (Gardner and MacIntyre, 1993a ; Wang and Jiang, 2022 ), the participants' Chinese learning achievement was assessed both objectively and subjectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…It is no doubt that learners' L2 proficiency could be best assessed using a comprehensive standardized test, such as HSK (Hanyu shuiping kaoshi, Chinese proficiency test) for Chinese. However, these tests are difficult to obtain and are time-consuming to administer, making them ineffective for research purposes (Zhang et al, 2020b ). More importantly, the outbreak of COVID-19 pandemic has interrupted the administration of standardized language tests.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among the participants, there were 16 males, with an average age of 24.18 years ( SD = 2.50) and 16 females, with an average age of 24 ( SD = 2.48). Because Hanyu Shuiping Kaoshi (HSK) is a standardized international Chinese proficiency test for non-native speakers ( Zhang, 2018 , 2021 ; Zhang et al, 2020 ), this study placed learners into either a high-proficiency group or a low-proficiency group based on their HSK grades. Sixteen high-proficiency learners had achieved HSK-5 ( n = 8) or HSK-6 ( n = 8) and had studied Chinese for about 3 or 4 years.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the 15 heritage participants in our study who took the HSK, the mean HSK score was 267.5 (range: 211-288) of a total score of 300, indicating participants' high level of Chinese proficiency. According to Zhang et al (2020), the HSK yields the most consistent and reliable results with the largest effect size to examine a student's Chinese proficiency level, compared to a self-report measure of years of instruction in Chinese, a reading comprehension test, and a Chinese character recognition test in their study. All participants were undergraduate or graduate students at a University in Shanghai, right-handed according to self-report, with no reading disabilities and with normal or correct-to-normal vision.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%