“…Because the summary scores from the 2 parts are highly correlated (Pearson r = 0.749, p < 0.001), only the Part 1 summary and total TAI scores were reported. This is consistent with others who have published results on the TAI (Tsai, Rice, Hoelmer, Boninger, & Koontz, , Hogaboom, Diehl, et al, , Hogaboom, Huang, Worobey, Koontz, & Boninger, , Hogaboom, Worobey, & Boninger, , Tsai et al, , Worobey, Rigot, Hogaboom, Venus, & Boninger, , Tsai et al, ).…”