2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2009.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating the effects of peer association and parental influence on adolescent substance use: A study of adolescents in South Korea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
31
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
2
31
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the key role of social support and emotional support, and their effect on hardiness, students who live away from their families experience less hardiness perhaps due to insufficient emotional support especially in the freshman year. The results of the previous studies show that presence of addicted person in the family is an important factor in addiction potential (36,37). Contrary to expectation, this study shows that students who have addicted person in the family reported lower extents of addiction potential compared to those who did not have an addicted family member.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 89%
“…Considering the key role of social support and emotional support, and their effect on hardiness, students who live away from their families experience less hardiness perhaps due to insufficient emotional support especially in the freshman year. The results of the previous studies show that presence of addicted person in the family is an important factor in addiction potential (36,37). Contrary to expectation, this study shows that students who have addicted person in the family reported lower extents of addiction potential compared to those who did not have an addicted family member.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 89%
“…This is consistent with our findings that students who think their parents will not mind whether they smoked when they were older are more likely to have experimented with smoking. Our study also confirmed a positive association between experimenting with smoking and smoking behaviors of peers among very young students in Taiwan and South Korea [44,50]. Specifically, youth behaviors are heavily shaped by social interaction with peers; in fact, the utility of a given activity depends on the actions of their peers [51,52].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Specifically, youth behaviors are heavily shaped by social interaction with peers; in fact, the utility of a given activity depends on the actions of their peers [51,52]. A friend who smokes may provide a young person with access to cigarettes or exert pressure on that individual to initiate smoking [44,50,53]. Although a youth may select friends who smoke because smoking peers are more accepting of others who smoke (selection effect), studies have provided evidence in support of the peer effect (i.e., having friends who smoke causally increases the risk of smoking initiation) instead of the selection effect [54,55].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,9 The results indicated that most children were already familiar with tobacco use since they commonly watched cigarette smoking in family. In addition, Gilman, et al 10 (New England), Sirirassamee, et al 11 (Thailand), Kim, et al 12 (South Korea) observed that parental smoking status seemed like a stronger predictor on smoking among adolescents. In the present study, the strongest family related predictor was the smoking status of the mother.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Smoking behaviour is a learning process from higher level status in vertical level social context, from parents to a kid, whilst they unconsciously give an example to children on cigarette use during smoking. 6,13 However, Sirirassamee, et al 11 and Kim, et al 12 studies did not include the smoking status of father and mother separately. Since the prevalence of children with a father who smoked was high, children were more likely familiar with male smokers than female smokers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%