Investigating the effectiveness of re-opening policies before vaccination during a pandemic: SD modelling research based on COVID-19 in Wuhan

Abstract

Background Lockdown policies were widely adopted during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic to control the spread of the virus before vaccines became available. These policies had significant economic impacts and caused social disruptions. Early re-opening is preferable, but it introduces the risk of a resurgence of the epidemic. Although the World Health Organization has outlined criteria for re-opening, decisions on re-opening are mainly based on epidemiologic criteria. To date, the effectiveness of re-opening policies remains unclear. Methods A system dynamics COVID-19 model, SEIHR(Q), was constructed by integrating infection prevention and control measures implemented in Wuhan into the classic SEIR epidemiological model and was validated with real-world data. The input data were obtained from official websites and the published literature. Results The simulation results showed that track-and-trace measures had significant effects on the level of risk associated with re-opening. In the case of Wuhan, where comprehensive contact tracing was implemented, there would have been almost no risk associated with re-opening. With partial contact tracing, re-opening would have led to a minor second wave of the epidemic. However, if only limited contact tracing had been implemented, a more severe second outbreak of the epidemic would have occurred, overwhelming the available medical resources. If the ability to implement a track-trace-quarantine policy is fixed, the epidemiological criteria need to be further taken into account. The model simulation revealed different levels of risk associated with re-opening under different levels of track-and-trace ability and various epidemiological criteria. A matrix was developed to evaluate the effectiveness of the re-opening policies. Conclusions The SEIHR(Q) model designed in this study can quantify the impact of various re-opening policies on the spread of COVID-19. Integrating epidemiologic criteria, the contact tracing policy, and medical resources, the model simulation predicts whether the re-opening policy is likely to lead to a further outbreak of the epidemic and provides evidence-based support for decisions regarding safe re-opening during an ongoing epidemic. Keyords COVID-19; Risk of re-opening; Effectiveness of re-opening policies; IPC measures; SD modelling.

The association between first and second wave COVID-19 mortality in Italy

“…Local policies were permitted beginning as of November 6, 2020. In addition, the pattern we investigated is based on 'real' data, compared to studies presenting predictive modeling [34,35], thus strengthening our findings.…”

Using simulation modelling and systems science to help contain COVID‐19: A systematic review

“…There are 54 simulation papers using SDM, accounting for 14.5% of all selected research, where one paper used a simple SIR model (Pornphol & Chittayasothorn, 2020 ), one paper used a SIRD model (Ibarra‐Vega, 2020 ), two papers used a classic SEIR model (Kumar, Priya, & Srivastava, 2021 ; Yusoff & Izhan, 2020 ) and seven papers constructed a SEIRD model (Abdolhamid et al, 2021 ; Khairulbahri, 2021 ; Liu et al, 2021 ; Mutanga et al, 2021 ; Struben, 2020 ; Sy et al, 2021 ; Zhao et al, 2020 ). In the modified papers, new states such as pre‐symptomatic (Rahmandad et al, 2021 ), asymptomatic (Fair et al, 2021 ; Sy et al, 2020 ), symptomatic (Currie et al, 2020 ; Fair et al, 2021 ), quarantined (Currie et al, 2020 ; Kumar, Viswakarma, et al, 2021 ; Qian et al, 2021 ), isolated (Niwa et al, 2020 ), hospitalized or in treatment (Hu et al, 2021 ; Qian et al, 2021 ; Rahmandad et al, 2021 ) and vaccinated (Brereton & Pedercini, 2021 ; Suphanchaimat, Tuangratananon, et al, 2021 ) were introduced into the models. In addition, without providing particular application cases, three papers built conceptual macro‐level SDMs to understand the emergence of COVID‐19 and system resilience and vulnerability in response to public health emergencies, respectively (Kontogiannis, 2021 ; Wang et al, 2020 ; Wang & Mansouri, 2021 ).…”

Which Matters More in Fighting COVID-19—Government Policy or Community Participation?

“…The model simulates the progression of COVID-19 in Shanghai over the 9-month period from 20 January 2020, when the first case of COVID-19 appeared in Shanghai, to 19 October 2020, long after the COVID-19 outbreak in Shanghai had declined. The SEIR model has been widely used for investigating COVID-19 (17,18,22), suggesting that the model structure is valid. The model parameter setting is mostly referred to previous literature (19)(20)(21).…”