2020
DOI: 10.3390/app10186335
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating the Effect of Cross-Modeling in Landslide Susceptibility Mapping

Abstract: To mitigate the negative effects of landslide occurrence, there is a need for effective landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM). The fundamental source for LSM is landslide inventory. Unfortunately, there are still areas where landslide inventories are not generated due to financial or reachability constraints. Considering this led to the following research question: can we model landslide susceptibility in an area for which landslide inventory is not available but where such is available for surrounding areas?… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(119 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The landslide susceptibility indices (LSIs) were generated to produce an LSM. LSIs were divided into the five classes of very low, low, moderate, high, and very high susceptibility using the Jenks natural break classification method [24,53,67]. The Jenks natural break classification method is used to determine the arrangement of values into different classes by minimizing and maximizing each class's deviation from the class mean and other groups' means, respectively [12,42,68].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The landslide susceptibility indices (LSIs) were generated to produce an LSM. LSIs were divided into the five classes of very low, low, moderate, high, and very high susceptibility using the Jenks natural break classification method [24,53,67]. The Jenks natural break classification method is used to determine the arrangement of values into different classes by minimizing and maximizing each class's deviation from the class mean and other groups' means, respectively [12,42,68].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the study, the slope failure susceptibility due to underlying causative factors [8] was considered. Land cover, lithology, elevation, proximity to roads, drainage, fault lines, slope aspect, and slope angle were considered as causal factors based on literature [53] and the availability of data for the study area. Each causal factor was mapped and divided into the several equal interval classes described in the legend in Figure 4.…”
Section: Causative Factor Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SCAI is the ratio of the percentage of the pixels of a landslide susceptibility zone to the percentage of existing landslide pixels in that susceptibility zone. The model is considered excellent if the value of the SCAI decreases from a very low to a very high LS class (Arabameri et al, 2020;Pawluszek-Filipiak et al, 2020). The SCAI is calculated using the following equation:…”
Section: Validation Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of spatial relationship between landslide locations and related conditioning factors using the frequency ratio (FR) model are shown in Appendix A Table A1. The frequency ratio method can evaluate the sub-classes of specific factors and provide useful instructions for decision-makers to understand the conditioning factors related to landslides and make better policies [11,16,30]. The higher FR value shows that landslide hazards are more prone to occur in corresponding zone [69].…”
Section: Conditioning Factors Analyses Using Frequency Ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantitative methods mainly depend on the relationship between influencing factors and landslide occurrences and can be grouped into two categories, i.e., physically-based methods and data-driven approaches. Physically-based methods assess landslide susceptibility based on simplified physically modeling strategy [6], while data-driven approaches develop a functional relationship between conditioning factors and the past and historical landslide events [7], including weights of evidence [8][9][10], frequency ratio [11], random forest [12,13], artificial neural network (ANN) [14,15], convolutional neural networks [16,17], and support vector machine (SVM) [18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%