2018
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201732309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating the dynamical history of the interstellar object ’Oumuamua

Abstract: Here we try to find the origin of 1I/2017 U1 'Oumuamua, the first interstellar object recorded inside the solar system. To this aim, we searched for close encounters between 'Oumuamua and all nearby stars with known kinematic data during their past motion. We had checked over 200 thousand stars and found just a handful of candidates. If we limit our investigation to within a 60 pc sphere surrounding the Sun, then the most probable candidate for the 'Oumuamua parent stellar habitat is the star UCAC4 535-065571.… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some authors have attempted to identify the star or association from which 1I/'Oumuamua originated, but these studies generally do not take into account the errors in stellar positions, which is the most important source of uncertainty (Dybczyński & Królikowska 2018). Other caveats are that young stellar associations are dispersed over 10's of pc (Gaidos 2018), and that given the typical interstellar distance between encounters, large perpendicular displacements can be produced, making it difficult to predict the result of successive stellar encounters (Zhang 2018).…”
Section: Resulting Mass Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors have attempted to identify the star or association from which 1I/'Oumuamua originated, but these studies generally do not take into account the errors in stellar positions, which is the most important source of uncertainty (Dybczyński & Królikowska 2018). Other caveats are that young stellar associations are dispersed over 10's of pc (Gaidos 2018), and that given the typical interstellar distance between encounters, large perpendicular displacements can be produced, making it difficult to predict the result of successive stellar encounters (Zhang 2018).…”
Section: Resulting Mass Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…N-body effects. Dybczyński & Królikowska (2018) took into account the gravitational interactions of 57 stars in their study of the possible origin of 'Oumuamua (discussed in the next section), although they neglected the (more significant) uncertainties in the stellar astrometry and radial velocities. We explicitly tested the effects of including the gravity of the closest 100 closest encounters to 'Oumuamua (identified from the orbital integration with solution 2 k=2), on the orbits of both 'Oumuamua and the stars.…”
Section: Interaction With a Second Starmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference of about 0.4 • between the purely gravitational solution JPL 13 and 2 k=2 (Figure 1) corresponds to a difference of 0.35 pc after a journey of 50 pc (for linear motions). Dybczyński & Królikowska (2018) compiled data from Simbad, which was mostly TGAS and Hipparcos astrometry, and RAVE-DR4 (Kordopatis et al 2013) and RAVE-DR5 (Kunder et al 2017) radial velocities. They found HIP 3757 to be the closest encounter, with t enc = −0.118 Myr, d enc = 0.0044 pc, v enc = 185 km s −1 , but they sensibly disregarded this as a likely home for 'Oumuamua due to the large encounter velocity.…”
Section: Comparison To Previous Searchesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This proportion depends on the threshold used to define the JupiterSaturn barrier. Using 15 AU in both cases yields a proportion of "fake" new comets in the observations sample of around 50% (51% for Dybczyński & Królikowska 2011) and (49% for Dybczyński & Królikowska 2015), and from the simulations, this proportion is about 61% in Fouchard et al (2014) and 55% in Fouchard et al (2017). We still refer for historical reason to these comets as the new long-period comets.…”
Section: Observed Samplesmentioning
confidence: 88%