2021
DOI: 10.1080/14703297.2021.1966821
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating the depth of problem-solving prompts in collaborative argumentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They found that the level of learner‐learner interaction was limited to the lower stages of IAM (e.g., sharing and comparing information). In another study, he and his colleagues used stages 1–5 of the IAM to analyse the contents of an online discussion board and explored the extent to which learners engaged in collaborative argumentation guided by both problem representation and problem‐solving processes (Tawfik et al, 2021). Myers (2021) used the IAM to code and analyse the contents of 89 discussion posts to examine learners' constructions of the meaning of citizenship in a globalized world.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They found that the level of learner‐learner interaction was limited to the lower stages of IAM (e.g., sharing and comparing information). In another study, he and his colleagues used stages 1–5 of the IAM to analyse the contents of an online discussion board and explored the extent to which learners engaged in collaborative argumentation guided by both problem representation and problem‐solving processes (Tawfik et al, 2021). Myers (2021) used the IAM to code and analyse the contents of 89 discussion posts to examine learners' constructions of the meaning of citizenship in a globalized world.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As described in the above studies (see, e.g., Gunawardena et al, 1997; Huang et al, 2019; Lin & Tsai, 2012; Myers, 2021; Tawfik et al, 2017, 2021; Wang et al, 2019; Zhu, 2006), many researchers have used a variety of methods to identify and analyse interactions and cognitive engagement in online learning environments. Although the aforementioned studies have made great efforts to analyse learners' interactions and cognitive engagement in online learning environments, the use of traditional manual coding methods is very time‐consuming and degrades classification performance, especially for thousands of large samples of data.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%