2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.11.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating the association between depression and cerebral haemodynamics—A systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
0
6
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In this framework, neuroimaging meta-analysis emerges as a potent approach to synthesizing the multitude of results from published imaging literature in an unbiased manner, with the advantages of enlarging sample size, increasing power, and separating the consistent findings from those occurring by chance (Muller et al, 2018). Although there have been prior neuroimaging meta-analyses examining CBF abnormalities in MDD (Chen et al, 2015; Chithiramohan et al, 2022; Hamilton et al, 2012; Li et al, 2017; Wang & Yang, 2022), a rapidly increasing number of recent publications in the field along with continuing improvements in meta-analytic methods (Albajes-Eizagirre, Solanes, Vieta, & Radua, 2019b) have allowed us to attempt a more thorough characterization of CBF changes in MDD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this framework, neuroimaging meta-analysis emerges as a potent approach to synthesizing the multitude of results from published imaging literature in an unbiased manner, with the advantages of enlarging sample size, increasing power, and separating the consistent findings from those occurring by chance (Muller et al, 2018). Although there have been prior neuroimaging meta-analyses examining CBF abnormalities in MDD (Chen et al, 2015; Chithiramohan et al, 2022; Hamilton et al, 2012; Li et al, 2017; Wang & Yang, 2022), a rapidly increasing number of recent publications in the field along with continuing improvements in meta-analytic methods (Albajes-Eizagirre, Solanes, Vieta, & Radua, 2019b) have allowed us to attempt a more thorough characterization of CBF changes in MDD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, rCBF is lower in patients with mild depression compared to the normal control group, whereas it is higher in patients with moderate to severe depression compared to the rCBF in most cortical regions of the normal control group. 45 , 46 The changes in rCBF can lead to hemodynamic responses, which can be measured using an fNIRS device, making it an important tool for studying depression. However, the fNIRS device is sensitive to motion artifacts and noise, posing a challenge in filter out noise while retaining depression-related information.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients with depression have signi cantly reduced CBF, particularly in the prefrontal region, and rCBF differs among those with varying degrees of depression. Speci cally, patients with mild depression have signi cantly lower rCBF than the normal control group, while those with moderate to severe depression have signi cantly higher rCBF than most cortical regions [35,36]. FNIRS is an important tool for investigating CBF in depressed patients, but it is sensitive to jitter and artefact noise.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%