Investigating Suppression of Cloud Return with a Novel Optical Configuration of a Doppler Lidar

Abstract

The full-width at half-maximum or probe length of the Lorentzian weighting function of continuous-wave Doppler lidars increases quadratically with the focus distance, which results in a deterioration in the spatial resolution of measurements. What is worse, a Doppler lidar is susceptible to moving objects that are far away from the intended measurement point. Therefore, we suggest a novel configuration to mitigate these problems by deploying two co-planar quarter-wave plates with orthogonal fast axes in the conventional continuous-wave lidar system, without any change to the other optical or electronic components. If the vertically polarized laser beam that we emit goes out and its backscattered beam returns back through the same quarter-wave plate, the returned beam will become horizontally polarized. The horizontally polarized backscattered beam cannot beat with the vertically polarized local oscillator to generate a Doppler signal. However, the polarization of the returned beam will remain unchanged if the emitted beam travels out through one plate and returns through the other. In this way, the influence of a moving backscattering particle far away from the focus point can be reduced. Both theoretical and experimental results show that, in a proper configuration, the probe length of the continuous-wave lidar can be reduced by 10%, compared with that of the conventional lidar. In addition, the fat tails of the Lorentzian weighting function can be suppressed by up to 80% to reduce the return from a cloud, albeit with a large reduction (perhaps 90%) in the signal power. This investigation provides a potential method to increase the spatial resolution of Doppler wind lidars and suppress the low-hanging cloud return.

Rotary-wing drone-induced flow – comparison of simulations with lidar measurements

“…Despite this, CW Doppler lidars are susceptible to interference from moving objects away from the intended focus point, such as flying birds. Besides, their spatial resolution decreases as the focus distance increases, which may degrade the accuracy of wind velocity and turbulence measurements by CW lidars (Jin et al, 2022b). Therefore, we placed the three lidars as close to the intended scanning positions as possible to decrease the measurement volume (Angelou et al, 2012) and minimize potential biases resulting from volume averaging (Clive, 2008;Sjöholm et al, 2009;Forsting et al, 2017).…”