Investigating students’ seriousness during selected conceptual inventory surveys

Waters, D. P.; Amarie, Dragos; Booth, Rebecca A.; Conover, Christopher J.; Sayre, Eleanor C.

doi:10.1103/physrevphyseducres.15.020118

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 39 publications

(47 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The half of our participants who were unwilling to attempt any pre-assessment items which they have never been taught to solve would not likely be swayed by incentives to participate. Research on student effort on pre-assessment and on incentives for preassessment participation have used methods which would not detect the patterns of low effort described herein [12,13,19]. Providing incentives does not address the core issue that students do not believe they can do better than mere guessing.…”

Section: A Implications For Instruction and Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The prevalence of pre-assessments motivates this exploration into the risks that they may carry for the students who take them. Several scholars have provided recommendations for best practices for pre-assessments [9][10][11][12][13], but these recommendations are not grounded in research evidence and there has not been a systematic study of students' reactions to and experiences of pre-assessments. We initially consider the potential risk to students in terms of their affective state in response to taking a pre-assessment.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Student perceptions of pre-assessments: "It's basically just guessing anyways"

Allen¹,

Phillips²,

Kizilcec³

2021

2021 Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Pre-assessments are a popular tool among researchers and instructors in higher education, but they may pose risks to students, instructors, and researchers that are largely unexplored. To investigate potential risks, we conducted ten semi-structured interviews with college students about their experiences taking pre-assessments. Students unanimously found pre-assessments to be non-threatening and their performance on them to be inconsequential, because they did not interpret them as a predictor of success or indicator of their inherent ability. Instead, students attributed their pre-assessment performance to having previously taken a relevant course with similar assessment items. As a result, half of the students were not motivated at all to put effort into taking the pre-assessment, especially for difficult items. Students believed that pre-assessments are intended to inform the instructor in making tailored course revisions to meet student needs. They valued pre-assessments more if they believed that the instructor uses the pre-assessment results to make course revisions, but half of the students doubted that their instructor would do so. Taken together, our findings suggest that pre-assessments do not pose a direct risk to students, but they may indirectly affect students' learning experience or relationship with the instructor if the use of pre-assessments undermines the instructor's credibility. Moreover, students' lack of motivation to complete pre-assessments can render them an inaccurate measure for instructors and researchers. We therefore encourage instructors and researchers to clearly communicate the specific uses of pre-assessments to students before assigning them.

show abstract

Section: A Implications For Instruction and Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%