Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2013
DOI: 10.3847/aer2013016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating Student Ideas About Cosmology III: Big Bang Theory, Expansion, Age, and History of the Universe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of this study are also related to the findings from Trouille et al [17] on the expansion of the Universe and Coble et al [16] on dark energy. As reported in those papers, in preinstruction interviews in which students were asked how the Universe has changed over time, two out of three students discussed the expansion.…”
Section: Code Examplessupporting
confidence: 62%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The results of this study are also related to the findings from Trouille et al [17] on the expansion of the Universe and Coble et al [16] on dark energy. As reported in those papers, in preinstruction interviews in which students were asked how the Universe has changed over time, two out of three students discussed the expansion.…”
Section: Code Examplessupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Responses of we don't know were coded as incomplete, while those that supplemented we don't know with another thematic code were coded as either incomplete or partial. This differs from how we don't know responses were treated in Coble et al [15,16] and Trouille et al [17], because we don't know is a more reasonable response given the current understanding of dark energy among astronomers. We don't know responses differ from we'll never know responses, which were coded as wrong.…”
Section: B Astro 101 Preinstruction Results: Correctnesscontrasting
confidence: 43%
See 3 more Smart Citations