2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2004.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating spoken Arabic digits in speech recognition setting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Human voice typically has the trait that the signal components possessing lower frequencies encompass higher amplitudes [17], where the higher frequencies encompass comparatively smaller amplitude. In this phenomenon, the higher frequencies (which have lower amplitude) have a lot of chances to be eliminated from the signal in the noise removal process as a noise.…”
Section: Pre-emphasismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Human voice typically has the trait that the signal components possessing lower frequencies encompass higher amplitudes [17], where the higher frequencies encompass comparatively smaller amplitude. In this phenomenon, the higher frequencies (which have lower amplitude) have a lot of chances to be eliminated from the signal in the noise removal process as a noise.…”
Section: Pre-emphasismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Malay digits has reported a recognition rate of 80.5% and 90.7% when dynamic time warping and Hidden Markov Model (HMM) techniques were used respectively (Al-Haddad et al, 2008), whereas recognition rates of 98% (Azam et al, 2007), 99.5% (Alotaibi, 2005) and 98.125% to 100% (Dede et al, 2010) were reported in a similar application using neural networks.…”
Section: Automatic Speech Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the relevance of this problem, several papers have been published, trying to improve digit recognition in different languages, such as English (NIMJE; SHANDILYA, 2011), Portuguese (SILVA et al, 2012), Arabic (ALOTAIBI, 2005) and Mandarin (SHYU et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%