Investigating Spatial Patterns of Persistent Scatterer Interferometry Point Targets and Landslide Occurrences in the Arno River Basin

Abstract

Persistent Scatterer Interferometry (PSI) has been widely used for landslide studies in recent years. This paper investigated the spatial patterns of PSI point targets and landslide occurrences in the Arno River basin in Central Italy. The main purpose is to analyze whether spatial patterns of Persistent Scatterers (PS) can be recognized as indicators of landslide occurrences throughout the whole basin. The bivariate K-function was employed to assess spatial relationships between PS and landslides. The PSI point targets were acquired from almost 4 years (from March 2003 to January 2007) of RADARSAT-1 images. The landslide inventory was collected from 15 years (from 1992-2007) of surveying and mapping data, mainly including remote sensing data, topographic maps and field investigations. The proposed approach is able to assess spatial patterns between a variety of PS and landslides, in particular, to understand if PSI point targets are spatially clustered (spatial attraction) or randomly distributed (spatial independency) on various types of landslides across the basin. Additionally, the degree and scale distances of PS clustering on a variety of landslides can be characterized. The results rejected the null hypothesis that PSI point targets appear to cluster similarly on four types of landslides (slides, flows, falls and creeps) in the Arno River basin. Significant influence OPEN ACCESSRemote Sens. 2014, 6 6818 of PS velocities and acquisition orbits can be noticed on detecting landslides with different states of activities. Despite that the assessment may be influenced by the quality of landslide inventory and Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) images, the proposed approach is expected to provide guidelines for studies trying to detect and investigate landslide occurrences at a regional scale through spatial statistical analysis of PS, for which an advanced understanding of the impact of scale distances on landslide clustering is fundamentally needed.

Evaluation of the SBAS InSAR Service of the European Space Agency’s Geohazard Exploitation Platform (GEP)

“…However, sometimes Earth scientists are prone to work with less accurate data, especially if they intend to delineate areas that are in motion, regardless of the local accuracy. Examples of this are the works of Galve et al [6], Lu et al [50], and Chaussard et al [51], which analyzed karst subsidence, landslides, and active tectonics with coherence thresholds of 0.4, 0.6, 0.5, respectively. This is especially true if the main goal of the analysis is to carry out a preliminary exploration to select points that are to be visited later in the field.…”

Identification of Forested Landslides Using LiDar Data, Object-based Image Analysis, and Machine Learning Algorithms

“…The Three Gorges area is characterized by steep and rugged terrain with heavy vegetation cover, often obscuring or subduing morphologic features indicative of landslides [12,13]. The landscape makes it particularly challenging to identify landslides using optical and aerial photographs, synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images, high spatial resolution multispectral images, moderate resolution digital terrain models (DTMs), and very high resolution (VHR) satellite images [6,[14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30].…”

Exploitation of Amplitude and Phase of Satellite SAR Images for Landslide Mapping: The Case of Montescaglioso (South Italy)

“…Geoscientists have widely exploited existing SAR archives chiefly to resolve the spatial distribution and to analyze the temporal evolution of displacements in areas affected by slow moving landslides [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. In many cases, they used different approaches belonging to the PSI family, which relies on the phase shift analysis of long series of co-registered, multi-temporal SAR images of the same target area.…”