2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2016.03.072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating proteomic methods and tools to assess sperm quality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proAKAP4 dosage sperm quality and functionality parameter in the dromedary camel may reflect the best fertility period. Low levels of AKAP4, and/or that of the proAKAP4 precursor molecule, were previously described as a pertinent sperm parameter for sperm quality assessments and to predict fertility in pig and bulls ( Peddinti et al 2008 , Sergeant et al 2016 , 2019 , Delehedde et al 2018 , Ruelle et al 2019 ). ProAKAP4 concentrations have been correlated with fertility in pigs ( Sergeant et al 2019 ), bulls ( Peddinti et al 2008 , Singh et al 2019 ) and mice ( Miki et al 2002, Fang et al 2019 , Xu et al 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proAKAP4 dosage sperm quality and functionality parameter in the dromedary camel may reflect the best fertility period. Low levels of AKAP4, and/or that of the proAKAP4 precursor molecule, were previously described as a pertinent sperm parameter for sperm quality assessments and to predict fertility in pig and bulls ( Peddinti et al 2008 , Sergeant et al 2016 , 2019 , Delehedde et al 2018 , Ruelle et al 2019 ). ProAKAP4 concentrations have been correlated with fertility in pigs ( Sergeant et al 2019 ), bulls ( Peddinti et al 2008 , Singh et al 2019 ) and mice ( Miki et al 2002, Fang et al 2019 , Xu et al 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, proAKAP4 is one of fertility associated protein markers that have been identified more than 30 years from now and have been today developed as a robust tool as we will described below. With the 4MID® kits, that quantify the proAKAP4 is fresh as in frozen semen, breeders have today a valuable tool to evaluate semen quality and predict fertility in bull and swine [11,12]. This newly approach to evaluate semen quality and fertility is based on a protein marker detected through a sandwich ELISA kit format that analyze up to 87 semen simultaneously (Table 1).…”
Section: Journal Of Dairy and Veterinary Sciencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ing ELISA approaches, only request a plate reader equipment. The concentrations of proAKAP4 using the Pig 4MID® kit as measured in semen of 13 boars with similar sperm parameters, exhibited striking variations from a boar to another stressing out the interest to have a functional sperm parameter [11,12]. When the same semen doses of those followed animals were used to inseminate 210 sows, an increase of both fertility index and prolificity were observed in the groups of swine gathered according a threshold concentration of 45ng of proAKAP4 /10 millions of spermatozoa (unpublished data).…”
Section: Journal Of Dairy and Veterinary Sciencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unravelling the events that govern a conception success or failure, and understanding the molecular cascades that regulate fertility, requires a systems biology approach utilizing high throughput omics technologies. The advent of increasingly sophisticated proteomic technologies has enabled many detailed investigations, not only into the composition of mammalian spermatozoa (Baker et al 2008, Somashekar et al 2015, Swegen et al 2015, Sergeant et al 2016, Martín-Cano et al 2020, but also into the identification of numerous proteomic fertility biomarker candidates in mice (Baker et al 2005), men (de Mateo et al 2007, Netherton et al 2017, bulls (Park et al 2012, Somashekar et al 2017 and boars (Kwon et al 2015a,b). To our knowledge, only one study has utilized omics technologies in identifying such biomarkers in stallion ejaculates (Novak et al 2010), and reported that sperm protein expression accounted for only 10% of fertility variability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%