1997
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/287.3.641
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating properties of a set of variable AGN with cluster analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This cluster analysis indicates that the variability indices at 4.8 and 14.5 GHz are most strongly related and also identifies a weaker relation between S av (14.5) and α av . In contrast with the result of Nair (1997), based on long-term Rosemary Hill optical data for a sample of 23 BL Lacs (of which 20 are contained in our group) our cluster analysis results quantify that the amplitude of variability in the radio band does not increase with redshift.…”
Section: Although Our Study Finds Variability Differences Between Bl contrasting
confidence: 99%
“…This cluster analysis indicates that the variability indices at 4.8 and 14.5 GHz are most strongly related and also identifies a weaker relation between S av (14.5) and α av . In contrast with the result of Nair (1997), based on long-term Rosemary Hill optical data for a sample of 23 BL Lacs (of which 20 are contained in our group) our cluster analysis results quantify that the amplitude of variability in the radio band does not increase with redshift.…”
Section: Although Our Study Finds Variability Differences Between Bl contrasting
confidence: 99%
“…1) graphically displays the relationships between the various properties of the FS-PR sources. In order to investigate possible groupings in this diagram, we have applied a cluster analysis to our data (e.g., Nair 1997). This method searches for natural groupings among variables that are most correlated.…”
Section: Cluster Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If this is so, then the reason some HPQs are not seen in γ-rays is probably due to intrinsic source differences or time variability. Nair (1997) has stated that cluster analysis shows that γ-ray sources have larger amplitudes of optical variability and are bluer at larger redshifts. Punsly (1996) has found that γ-ray quasars have larger mm spectral peaks relative to their cm spectral peaks than other core-dominated quasars.…”
Section: Comparison Of Egret and Non-egret Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%