2020
DOI: 10.2352/issn.2470-1173.2020.11.hvei-093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating Prediction Accuracy of Full Reference Objective Video Quality Measures through the ITS4S Dataset

Abstract: Fast track article for IS&T International Symposium on Electronic Imaging 2020: Human Vision and Electronic Imaging proceedings.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the experiments, we considered five datasets, namely, the VQEG-HD1, the VQEG-HD3, the VQEG-HD5 [28], the Netflix Public [8] and the ITS4S [29] datasets. Each VQEG dataset comprises ratings from 24 subjects for approximately 160 stimuli.…”
Section: A Experimental Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the experiments, we considered five datasets, namely, the VQEG-HD1, the VQEG-HD3, the VQEG-HD5 [28], the Netflix Public [8] and the ITS4S [29] datasets. Each VQEG dataset comprises ratings from 24 subjects for approximately 160 stimuli.…”
Section: A Experimental Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we used our proposed RMLE approach and SUREAL software to estimate the quality of subjectively annotated datasets without adding synthetic noise, as described in Section VI-B. For the experiment, we considered five different datasets, i.e., the four datasets used in Section VI-B plus the ITS4S dataset [29]. Even without the addition of synthetic noise, the ratings in these datasets exhibit some level of noise due to inherent subject inconsistency.…”
Section: E Assessing the Uncertainty On The Estimated Subjective Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%