2017
DOI: 10.1186/s12863-017-0575-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating population continuity with ancient DNA under a spatially explicit simulation framework

Abstract: BackgroundRecent advances in sequencing technologies have allowed for the retrieval of ancient DNA data (aDNA) from skeletal remains, providing direct genetic snapshots from diverse periods of human prehistory. Comparing samples taken in the same region but at different times, hereafter called “serial samples”, may indicate whether there is continuity in the peopling history of that area or whether an immigration of a genetically different population has occurred between the two sampling times. However, the ex… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2009), an approach that was recently extended to include structured populations (Silva et al. 2017). However, a comprehensive investigation into how these confounding variables violate the assumptions and impact the inferences of the methods outlined above is currently lacking.…”
Section: Caveats and Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2009), an approach that was recently extended to include structured populations (Silva et al. 2017). However, a comprehensive investigation into how these confounding variables violate the assumptions and impact the inferences of the methods outlined above is currently lacking.…”
Section: Caveats and Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the proportion of simulated F st that are greater than that observed is computed, and if it is smaller than 5%, the genetic shift is considered to be large enough to reject the population continuity hypothesis. This test has been recently improved by including two fundamental elements that were not considered in previous approaches: population subdivision and migration (Silva, Rio, & Currat, ). Under these continuity model assumptions, the genetic difference between the serial samples is due to sampling, genetic drift and ongoing gene flow with neighbours (Silva et al., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This test has been recently improved by including two fundamental elements that were not considered in previous approaches: population subdivision and migration (Silva, Rio, & Currat, ). Under these continuity model assumptions, the genetic difference between the serial samples is due to sampling, genetic drift and ongoing gene flow with neighbours (Silva et al., ). A rejection of the continuity hypothesis may thus indicate that genetic input due to immigration occurred during the period separating the two sampling times and was sufficient to create a detectable shift in allele frequency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence of long‐term genealogical continuity was found in several genetic isolates, such as the Basques in Iberia, Ogliastra in Sardinia, and Casentino in Tuscany (Ghirotto et al, , ; Günther et al, ; Sampietro et al, ) but were often rejected in more open areas (Bramanti et al, ; Gamba et al, ; Guimaraes et al, ; Malmström et al, ). Only very recently serial coalescent simulations supported genetic continuity from the Neolithic to this day in nonisolated regions such as the Paris basin (Rivollat et al, ; Silva, Rio, & Currat, ) and the Southern Caucasus (Margaryan et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%