2015 11th International Computer Engineering Conference (ICENCO) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/icenco.2015.7416336
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating mobile applications' requirements evolution through sentiment analysis of users' reviews

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Users" comments and reviews can contain useful information for developers; they include good, bad, or recommended features [45]. Thus, the analysis of these reviews is important for the requirements engineering activities [46]. The proposed framework suggests the use of feedback analysis methods to gain the benefits from eLS users" comments and reviews in requirements elicitation activity while developing eLS.…”
Section: ) Elearning Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Users" comments and reviews can contain useful information for developers; they include good, bad, or recommended features [45]. Thus, the analysis of these reviews is important for the requirements engineering activities [46]. The proposed framework suggests the use of feedback analysis methods to gain the benefits from eLS users" comments and reviews in requirements elicitation activity while developing eLS.…”
Section: ) Elearning Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the areas of software engineering (SE) and information systems research, there are 11 literature reviews, that form the related work for our study. For more information on those reviews, we refer interested readers to Table 9 in Appendix .…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found only two SLRs that explicitly investigated empirical evidence on using crowdsourced user feedback for the purpose of requirements evolution. Both examined techniques that are applicable on the user review repositories for apps: Rizk et al examined automated tools for sentiment analysis by means of natural language processing, while Genc‐Nayebi and Abran focused on opinion mining techniques for the purpose of requirements evolution. Both studies focus on tools and technical solutions without discussion on (a) the nature of the crowdsourced user feedback, eg, implicit/explicit and (b) the specific ways in which feedback is used in RE activities.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies have focused on requirement extraction for mobile applications [1]. Rizk et al investigated users' reviews' Sentiment Analysis (SA) in order to extract user requirements to build new applications or enhance existing ones [2]. The authors analyzed users' feedback to extract the features and sentiment score of a mobile app in order to find useful information for app developers [3].…”
Section: Requirements Evolution Prediction Through Sentiment Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%