2019
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.13524
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating hydrologic responses to spatio‐temporal characteristics of storms using a Dynamic Moving Storm generator

Abstract: A synthetic storm generator—Dynamic Moving Storm (DMS)—is developed in this study to represent spatio‐temporal variabilities of rainfall and storm movement in synthetic storms. Using an urban watershed as the testbed, the authors investigate the hydrologic responses to the DMS parameters and their interactions. In order to reveal the complex nature of rainfall–run‐off processes, previously simplified assumptions are relaxed in this study regarding (a) temporal variability of rainfall intensity and (b) time‐inv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, the importance of storm direction in the peak flow response depends on the compounding effects of rainfall (e.g., storm extent, speed, duration, and intensity; Marco & Valdés, 1998; Singh, 2005) and watershed (e.g., geometry and river network structure) characteristics (Ayalew & Krajewski, 2017; Perez et al., 2018a). Based on these studies, the relationship between peak flow response and storm properties can be summarized in the following conclusions: (1) The effect of storm direction increases when the storm size is significantly smaller than the watershed size, and (2) the peak flow response tends to increase when the storm travels downstream along the main channel (Gao & Fang, 2019; Volpi et al., 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, the importance of storm direction in the peak flow response depends on the compounding effects of rainfall (e.g., storm extent, speed, duration, and intensity; Marco & Valdés, 1998; Singh, 2005) and watershed (e.g., geometry and river network structure) characteristics (Ayalew & Krajewski, 2017; Perez et al., 2018a). Based on these studies, the relationship between peak flow response and storm properties can be summarized in the following conclusions: (1) The effect of storm direction increases when the storm size is significantly smaller than the watershed size, and (2) the peak flow response tends to increase when the storm travels downstream along the main channel (Gao & Fang, 2019; Volpi et al., 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a mechanistic perspective, the role of storm direction in runoff generation has been explored with laboratory experiments (de Lima & Singh, 2003) and rainfall‐runoff modeling in natural and synthetic watersheds (C.‐L. Chang, 2007; Han et al., 2004; Kim & Seo, 2013; Seo & Schmidt, 2013, 2014) forced by real (Lee et al., 2015; Sigaroodi & Chen, 2016; ten Veldhuis et al., 2017) and synthetic (Fang et al., 2019; Gao & Fang, 2019, Nunes et al., 2006) storms. In general, the importance of storm direction in the peak flow response depends on the compounding effects of rainfall (e.g., storm extent, speed, duration, and intensity; Marco & Valdés, 1998; Singh, 2005) and watershed (e.g., geometry and river network structure) characteristics (Ayalew & Krajewski, 2017; Perez et al., 2018a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…manuscript submitted to AGU's Earth's Future While mounting evidence supports the increase in intensity and frequency of extreme storms in a warming climate, there is a lack of holistic understanding of changes in spatiotemporal patterns of these storms. Such insights about the spatio-temporal pattern of storms are pivotal for accurate flood behavior simulation (Gao & Fang, 2019;Ogden & Julien, 1993;Shah et al, 1996;V. P. Singh, 1997).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%