2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2014
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2014.383
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating Haze-Relevant Features in a Learning Framework for Image Dehazing

Abstract: Haze is one of the major factors that degrade outdoor images. Removing haze from a single image is known to be severely ill-posed, and assumptions made in previous methods do not hold in many situations. In this paper, we systematically investigate different haze-relevant features in a learning framework to identify the best feature combination for image dehazing. We show that the dark-channel feature is the most informative one for this task, which confirms the observation of He et al.[8] from a learning pers… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
328
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 507 publications
(331 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
328
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We utilize a low-pass Gaussian filter to refine the radiance map [14]. Gaussian filter is a nonlinear filter that smooth's the images.…”
Section: E Gaussian Filtermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We utilize a low-pass Gaussian filter to refine the radiance map [14]. Gaussian filter is a nonlinear filter that smooth's the images.…”
Section: E Gaussian Filtermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(4), which may cause the dehazing results too dark. Therefore, an adaptive exposure scaling [10] is adopted to adjust brightness for better visual effect. The adaptive exposure map s(x) is first obtained [10]:…”
Section: Brightness Adjustmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tang et al's method for preparing the training data [27], then collect the haze-free images from Google Images and Flickr and use them to create the synthetic depth maps and the equivalent hazy images for obtaining sufficient training samples. Generating the training samples is illustrated in Figure 3.…”
Section: B Training Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%