2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.05.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating ground vibration induced by moving train loads on unsaturated ground using 2.5D FEM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The accuracy of the present approach was validated by comparing the simulated results obtained with the proposed 2.5D approach with the field monitoring data obtained by BANVERKET (Swedish Rail Administration). Additionally, the simulated results were compared with those from Takemiya [18] and Gao et al [21] under train speeds of 70 and Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the application of the 2.5D finite element method in dynamic responses of an embankment-ground system (Adapted with permission from ref.…”
Section: Verification Of the 25d Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The accuracy of the present approach was validated by comparing the simulated results obtained with the proposed 2.5D approach with the field monitoring data obtained by BANVERKET (Swedish Rail Administration). Additionally, the simulated results were compared with those from Takemiya [18] and Gao et al [21] under train speeds of 70 and Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the application of the 2.5D finite element method in dynamic responses of an embankment-ground system (Adapted with permission from ref.…”
Section: Verification Of the 25d Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some published studies have revealed that dynamic characteristics of subgrade systems subjected to mov-ing train loads will violate the corresponding assumptions in the plane strain condition, although the cross-section of the subgrade is considered invariant along the direction of the moving load. The 2.5D finite element method was introduced by Yang et al [17] for understanding the dynamic responses in subgrade systems, and it has been increasingly used with the advantages of high efficiency, high accuracy and the ability to consider complex sections [10,[17][18][19][20][21], compared with a higher demand for meshing by employing a 3D finite element model. The accuracy of simulated results obtained using the 2.5D approach depends on several factors, including the number and corresponding size of meshes, resolution in the time-frequency domain and wave adsorption boundary.…”
Section: Brief Introduction Of Basic Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This assumption is not useful while considering track irregularities. Furthermore, a lot of FEM based parametric studies have been carried out to investigate the effect of moving load under different track and ground conditions [16][17][18][19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to the propagation of vibrations, how to establish an efficient field model under different subsoil conditions has been a research topic in recent years ( 23 25 ). Evaporation and transpiration in different regions mean that the degree of water saturation may also be considered in the subsoil model to make the displacement of soil skeleton and excess pore water pressure more realistic, and thus make the simulation of vibration propagation more accurate ( 26 , 27 ). In the reception and transmission of vibration to the surrounding buildings, types of building structures with different operating requirements are modeled and analyzed to evaluate the overall and local vibration of sensitive locations in the building ( 28 30 ), in which the dynamic interaction between structural foundation and subsoil should be considered ( 31 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%