Investigating glyphosate resistance in Amaranthus palmeri biotypes from Turkey

Mennan, Hüsrev; Altop, Emine Kaya; Belvaux, Xavier; Brants, Ivo; Zandstra, Bernard H.; Jabran, Khawar; Uysal, Meral Şahin

doi:10.1007/s12600-021-00910-2

Cited by 13 publications

(19 citation statements)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…57 Reports from recent years show that Amaranthus palmeri occurrence in new countries is steadily increasing. [57][58][59][60] 2.2.2 Impact Amaranthus palmeri strongly competes with annual arable crops such as peanut and cotton and to a lesser extent with maize and soybean, causing significant yield reduction. 53 The interference of Amaranthus palmeri with peanut and cotton is strong and leads to high seed production of the invader that replenishes the soil seedbank.…”

Section: Amaranthus Palmeri 221 Description Of Biological Cycle and H...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Early detection, herbicide resistance screening, and integrated management of invasive plant species: a review

Tataridas

Jabran

Kanatas

et al. 2022

Pest Management Science

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Invasive plant species (IPS) are often considered weeds that cause high yield losses in crops, negatively affect the environment, and disrupt certain ecosystem services. The negative impact of IPS on biodiversity is increasing and disturbing native vegetation. The management of plant invasions can be divided in two phases (before and after invasion). Prior to introduction it is crucial to develop the knowledge base (biology, ecology, distribution, impact, management) on IPS, prevention measures and risk assessment. After introduction if eradication fails, the monitoring and the integrated management of IPS are imperative to prevent the naturalization and further dispersal. This review uses two major invasive weed species (Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats. and Solanum elaeagnifolium Cav.) as case studies to propose a framework for early detection, rapid herbicide resistance screening, and integrated management. The holistic framework that is presented exploits recent: (i) novel detection tools, (ii) rapid tests and assays for herbicide resistance, and (iii) biology, ecology, distribution traits, and management tools for the IPS. Farmers, advisors, researchers, and policymakers need briefing on IPS growth dynamics, adaptability rates, and response to conventional and novel treatments to prevent new invasions, eradicate isolated stands, and mitigate the impact of invasive weed species in the long term.

show abstract

Section: Amaranthus Palmeri 221 Description Of Biological Cycle and H...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Early detection, herbicide resistance screening, and integrated management of invasive plant species: a review

Tataridas

Jabran

Kanatas

et al. 2022

Pest Management Science

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Whilst herbicide application is the most common method of weed control, recent research suggests that its success at controlling A. palmeri varies significantly between geographically separated populations due to the evolution of herbicide resistant biotypes (Berger et al, 2016; Culpepper et al, 2006; Heap, 2021; Küpper et al, 2017; Mennan et al, 2021; Norsworthy et al, 2008; Torra et al, 2020; Wise et al, 2009). It is suggested that it has been as a result of increasing use of transgenic crops that are herbicide resistant, that there has been an evolutionary change and development of herbicide resistance with A. palmeri (Duke et al, 2002).…”

Section: Review Of the Research Into Control Techniquesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…By 2009, A. palmeri was listed as the most troublesome weed of G. hirsutum crops in the USA and now poses a serious threat to agricultural production systems in over 45 countries (Figure 1 and Table 2) (Bensch et al, 2003;Milani et al, 2021;Webster and Nichols, 2012). It has been unintentionally introduced as a contaminant within the agricultural industry since the 20 th century (Culpepper et al, 2010; and is now listed as invasive, or at least being present, in several countries across Africa (Sukhorukov et al, 2021), Asia (Kistner and Hatfield, 2018;Mennan et al, 2021), Europe (Kistner and Hatfield, 2018;Milani et al, 2021;, North America (Briscoe Runquist et al, 2019;Kindscher et al, 2018), Oceania (Kistner and Hatfield, 2018) and South America (Küpper et al, 2017). Climate distribution models suggest that A. palmeri will continue to expand beyond its current distribution and is likely to spread more northward within North America and Europe (Briscoe Runquist et al, 2019;Kistner and Hatfield, 2018).…”

Section: Invasion In Other Regionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It also has the potential to hinder the growth of surrounding species due to its allelopathic properties and deep root system, the latter which quickly extracts moisture from the soil (Menges, 1987). These weedy characteristics have resulted in A. palmeri dominating agroecosystems within several countries, where it now causes severe environmental and economic damage (Bensch et al, 2003; Briscoe Runquist et al, 2019; Kanatas et al, 2021; Küpper et al, 2017; Mennan et al, 2021; Milani et al, 2021; Sukhorukov et al, 2021). Exacerbating this global problem is the identification of herbicide resistance in several A. palmeri populations in Argentina, Brazil, Israel, Mexico, Spain, Turkey and the United States of America, involving several herbicide mechanisms of action, with examples including acetolactate synthase (ALS) inhibiting herbicides (cloransulam‐ethyl, cloransulam‐methyl, imazethapyr, foramsulfuron, iodosulfuron‐methyl‐Na, metsulfuron‐methyl, nicosulfuron, rimsulfuron, trifloxysulfuron‐Na), synthetic auxins (2,4‐D, dicamba), 5‐enolpyruvylshikimate‐3‐phosphate synthase (EPSPS) inhibitor (glyphosate), 4‐hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase inhibitors (HPPD) (mesotrione), photosystem II (PSII) inhibitors (atrazine), protoporphyrinogen oxidase (PPO) inhibitors (acifluorfen), tubulin inhibitors (dinitroaniline, trifluralin) and long chain fatty acid inhibitors (LCFA) (metolachlor) (Berger et al, 2016; Culpepper et al, 2006; Heap, 2021; Küpper et al, 2017, 2018; Mennan et al, 2021; Norsworthy et al, 2008; Torra et al, 2020; Wise et al, 2009).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A review of the biology, distribution patterns and management of the invasive species Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson (Palmer amaranth): Current and future management challenges

Roberts

Florentine

2021

Weed Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson (Palmer amaranth) is an invasive agricultural weed that has quickly risen from a state of relative obscurity to now being globally regarded as one of the most economically destructive and difficult to manage weed species. It is now found in more than 45 countries where it poses a serious threat to agricultural production systems. Amaranthus palmeri is known to aggressively compete against crop plants for resources such as light, space, nutrients and soil moisture, all of which can result in significant crop yield reduction or even lead to crop failure. It has also been reported that A. palmeri is highly prone to evolve herbicide resistance; this makes management exceedingly challenging. Whilst there have been several control approaches introduced to manage the spread and impact of A. palmeri, many of them require more specific and focused research for their successful local and widespread application. In this regard, this global review explores the species’ biology and global distribution patterns, together with previous and current management strategies. It also explores and identifies promising areas of research that still require further investigation to more confidently assist in the control and containment of this globally concerning weed.

show abstract

“…In the European Union, glyphosate has been approved until 2022, and reevaluation procedures are ongoing 8 . While glyphosate was 300 tons in Turkey in 2001, it is estimated to reach 8,000 tons in 2019 [9][10][11][12] .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Glifosatın glukoz-6-fosfat dehidrogenaz enzim aktivitesi üzerindeki etkisinin in vitro koşullarda değerlendirilmesi

Kartlaşmış

Dikmen

2022

Cukurova Medical Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Öz Purpose:The aim of this study was to investigate in vitro effect of glyphosate on Glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) enzyme activity. Materials and Methods: In terms of G6PD enzyme deficiency, samples taken from healthy and enzyme deficient male individuals were studied. After the hemolysates were prepared from blood sample, G6PD enyzme activities were determined by the modified Beutler method. Then, the effects of different concentrations (5.3x10 -3 , 5.3x10 -4 , 5.3x10 -5 , 5.3x10 -6 mmol/mL) of glyphosate on G6PD activity were evaluated in normal and mutant enzymes. In addition, the in vitro effect of the antioxidant N-acetylcysteine (NAC) on the enzyme was investigated in the presence of glyphosate and without glyphosate. Results: While the result of normal erythrocyte G6PD activity was 12U/g for the individual, the result for the individual with enzyme deficiency was 2.5U/g Hb. The glyphosate's maximum activity loss in the G6PD enzyme was observed in the 60th minute incubation. The highest inhibition was observed at 5.3x10 -3 mmol/mL glyphosate. 4.7x10 -7 mmol/mL N-Acetylcysteine partially increased the inhibition of glyphosate in the G6PD enzyme in healthy individuals, but had no effect on mutant G6PD. Conclusion:In humans, it is predicted that glyphosate affects G6PD enzyme activity in vitro and is an interference agent in the experimental process. In case of contamination, studies on limits of glyphosate that will not cause harmful effects in humans should be continued.Amaç: Bu çalışmada, substrat Glukoz-6-fosfat (G6P) ile moleküler yapı benzerliği ve enzimin kofaktör olarak Mg +2 kullanması nedeniyle, eritrosit G6PD enzimi üzerindeki in vitro etkisi incelendi. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmada sağlıklı ve G6PD enzim eksikliği olan erkek bireylerin kan örneklerinden yararlanıldı. Hazırlanan hemolizatların enzim aktiviteleri modifiye Beutler yöntemi ile ölçüldükten sonra deney ortamına farklı derişimlerde (5.3x10 -3 , 5.3x10 -4 , 5.3x10 -5 , 5.3x10 -6 mmol/mL) glifosat eklenerek aktivite üzerindeki etkisi değerlendirildi. Daha sonra antioksidan Nasetilsisteinin normal ve mutant enzimler üzerindeki etkisi in vitro deney koşullarında glifosatlı ve glifosatsız ortamda karşılaştırıldı. Bulgular: Sağlıklı örnekte eritrosit G6PD aktivitesi 12, enzim eksikliği bulunan olguda ise 2.5 U/gr Hb olarak saptandı. Deney ortamına glifosat eklenmesinden sonra en yüksek aktivite kaybı 60. dakikada saptandı. En yüksek inhibisyon oranı ise 5.3x10 -3 mmol/mL glifosatın etkilediği çalışma setinde gözlendi. 4.7x10 -7 mmol/mL N-Asetilsistein, normal aktivitedeki G6PD enziminde glifosatın oluşturduğu inhibisyonu azalttı ancak mutant G6PD enzim aktivitesi üzerinde herhangi bir değişikliğe neden olmadı. Sonuç: Bu çalışmayla glifosatın insanlarda in vitro olarak eritrosit G6PD enzimini inhibe ettiği gösterildi. İlaveten laboratuvar ortamında G6PD enzim aktivitesinin ölçüldüğü ve/veya kullanıldığı deneysel süreçte, negatif interferans ajanı olarak davrandığı gösterildi. Ayrıca bulaşı durumlarında glifosatın insanlarda zararlı etkiy...

show abstract

Investigating glyphosate resistance in Amaranthus palmeri biotypes from Turkey

Cited by 13 publications

References 33 publications

Early detection, herbicide resistance screening, and integrated management of invasive plant species: a review

Early detection, herbicide resistance screening, and integrated management of invasive plant species: a review

A review of the biology, distribution patterns and management of the invasive species Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson (Palmer amaranth): Current and future management challenges

Glifosatın glukoz-6-fosfat dehidrogenaz enzim aktivitesi üzerindeki etkisinin in vitro koşullarda değerlendirilmesi

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About