2020
DOI: 10.20944/preprints202003.0036.v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating Feature Selection and Random Forests for Inter-patient Heartbeat Classification

Abstract: Finding an optimal combination of features and classifier is still an open problem in the development of automatic heartbeat classification systems, especially when applications that involve resource-constrained devices are considered. In this paper, a novel study of the selection of informative features and the use of a random forest classifier while following the recommendations of the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI) and an inter-patient division of datasets is presented. Fe… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To demonstrate the effect of our proposed features, we compare them against 24 gold-standard ECG features that measure the temporal characteristics of the ventricular depolarization waves (QRS complex) [ 18 , 20 ]. It includes the following: QRS complex widths, QS width, PR width, Peak Heights (P, R, Q, S), Peak Differences (PQ, RQ, RS), and normalized heart rate features, etc.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To demonstrate the effect of our proposed features, we compare them against 24 gold-standard ECG features that measure the temporal characteristics of the ventricular depolarization waves (QRS complex) [ 18 , 20 ]. It includes the following: QRS complex widths, QS width, PR width, Peak Heights (P, R, Q, S), Peak Differences (PQ, RQ, RS), and normalized heart rate features, etc.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It contributes to the literature by introducing a CVP signal preprocessing and feature extraction pipeline. We then compare the machine learning model based on extracted CVP features with the one based on gold standard ECG features [ 20 , 18 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%