Analyzing Affective Societies 2019
DOI: 10.4324/9780429424366-17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating emotions by using computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with Braun and Clarke's (2006; 2019) reflexive thematic analytical approach, verbatim transcripts were created while listening for emotion and documenting the unspoken (Ahmed, 2004; Ayata et al., 2019; Rapley, 2007). The use of “emotion talk” (Edwards, 1999) or conventional emotion labels were limited (Sauerborn, 2019; Wetherell, 2012) therefore initial coding focused on the practice of discursively constructed affective, and affected, bodies, practice and interactions (Berg et al., 2019). Furthermore, group and individual emotions were expected to be indicated by emotional language referencing a wider collective, such as attributions to “we” or “us” or expressed in a manner suggestive of collectively owned emotion (León & Zahavi, 2018; Salmela, 2012; Salmela & Nagatsu, 2016; Tuomela, 2013).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistent with Braun and Clarke's (2006; 2019) reflexive thematic analytical approach, verbatim transcripts were created while listening for emotion and documenting the unspoken (Ahmed, 2004; Ayata et al., 2019; Rapley, 2007). The use of “emotion talk” (Edwards, 1999) or conventional emotion labels were limited (Sauerborn, 2019; Wetherell, 2012) therefore initial coding focused on the practice of discursively constructed affective, and affected, bodies, practice and interactions (Berg et al., 2019). Furthermore, group and individual emotions were expected to be indicated by emotional language referencing a wider collective, such as attributions to “we” or “us” or expressed in a manner suggestive of collectively owned emotion (León & Zahavi, 2018; Salmela, 2012; Salmela & Nagatsu, 2016; Tuomela, 2013).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%